the national
pattern.
����������������
���������
The Taranaki Regional Council has a comprehensive programme to
monitor all resource consent holders, which consistently reveals a
generally high rate of compliance with consent conditions across
all sectors.
Basil Chamberlain
Chief Executive, Taranaki Regional Council
www.trc.govt.nz
Taranaki waterways – update 2013
Our monitoring record spans 17 years and the most recent results
have been the best yet in terms of the
resultant
changes to the baseline monitoring programme, they have been included in this report. This is to provide
some continuity and an indication of the further work required should the project proceed.
No rating is given for environmental or administrative performance as the project was on hold for the year
under review and monitoring was for the purpose of baseline monitoring as oppose to compliance
monitoring of the exercise of any of the consents.
This report includes recommendations
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
provision of information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take data) in accordance
methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement
and consent performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as
to the Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to
re-evaluate its approach and that of
consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of
methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving
sustainable development of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance
by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a
rating as to each Company’s
part of that invoice is in dispute.
2.3 If the Customer fails to make payment to the Council in accordance with the payment instructions on the invoice within the due date for
payment, the Council may charge interest on the unpaid sum noted in the invoice at a rate of 12% per annum for the period between the
due date for payment and the date of actual payment. If payment of the invoice (and any interest amounts) remains unpaid, the Council
may in its discretion and on reasonable notice
Discretionary May be non-notified
without written
approval
• Location of discharge
• Effects on conservation values
and ecosystems
• Effects on water quality
• Erosion effects
• Values and ecosystems
• Contingency planning to
prevent contaminant
discharges
• Quality of discharge and
possible treatment before
discharge
• Volume and rate of discharge
• Duration of consent
• Monitoring
• Review
• Administrative charges
1.1(a), 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 4.1, 5.4, 9.3,
9.6, 9.7