closed landfill site 38
Table 16 Summary of performance for Patea closed landfill stormwater and leachate consent 0427-3 39
Table 17 Summary of performance for Patea closed landfill air discharge consent 4636-2 39
Table 18 Summary of performance for Patea closed landfill stormwater and sediment consent 7268-1 40
List of figures
Figure 1 Regional map of STDC closed landfills 5
Figure 2 Eltham landfill and sampling sites (not currently monitored) 6
Figure 3 Aerial view of
Wai-iti resource consent monitoring report 2019-2020
Todd Generation Taranaki Ltd McKee Power Plant monitoring 2020-2021
Pohokura Production Station resource consent monitoring report 2020-2021
practicable option to minimise adverse
environmental effects.
Condition 7 requires all works shall comply with noise standards.
Condition 8 requires the consent holder to survey and map the position of the structures.
Condition 9 requires the consent holder undertake pre and post-lay surveys of the pipeline corridor.
page
9
Condition 10 states that the structure shall be removed and the area reinstated, if and when it is no longer
required.
Conditions 11 and 12 are
Taranaki climate hazards & extremes - high winds & tornadoes (NIWA, 2007).
and into land via landfarming during the 2011-2012
monitoring year 24
Table 9 Summary of performance for Consent 5956-1 to discharge drilling wastes
from hydrocarbon exploration and production activities, and oily wastes
from wellsites, onto and into land via landfarming during the 2012-2013
monitoring year 26
List of figures
Figure 1 Aerial photograph showing the layout of Waikaikai Landfarm and
approximate regional location (inset) 6
Figure 2 Supplied spreading map
The Mānuka & Kānuka Plantation Guide (Landcare Research).
FMU-based baseline states (expressed as percentages of stream lengths) for the macroinvertebrate numeric
attribute states are shown in Table 6. Maps of stream widths under each NOF band for all three numeric
attribute states are in Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11.
Table 6: FMU-based baseline states for the macroinvertebrate numeric attribute states (MCI, QMCI, ASPM) expressed as percentage
waterway length in each FMU within each NOF attribute band.
NOF Band
No.
sites
MCI
scale and can be interpreted as applying to a section of
river segments in an FMU, rather than a specific monitoring site.
FMU-based baseline states (expressed as percentages of stream lengths) for the macroinvertebrate numeric
attribute states are shown in Table 6. Maps of stream widths under each NOF band for all three numeric
attribute states are in Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11.
Table 6: FMU-based baseline states for the macroinvertebrate numeric attribute states (MCI,