Management Act 1991 and monitoring
The RMA primarily addresses environmental ‘effects’ which are defined as positive or adverse, temporary or
permanent, past, present or future, or cumulative. Effects may arise in relation to:
a. the neighbourhood or the wider community around an activity, and may include cultural and social-
economic effects;
b. physical effects on the locality, including landscape, amenity and visual effects;
c. ecosystems, including effects on plants, animals, or habitats,
aggregated donations, the date that each donation was received.
NB: Section 103A Local Etectorat Act 2001 defines "donation" as money or the equivalent of money or of goods or services or of a combination
of those things used in the candidate's etection campaign over 5300 in vatue. lt exctudes tabour and goods and services that are provided free of
charge reasonably valued at 5300 or tess.
NAME and ADDRESS of DONOR DESCRIPTION (inctude goods or seruices)* DONATION
Date received Amount
I\ 1
page
Offshore subtidal rocky reef
habitats on Pātea Bank, South
Taranaki
Prepared for Taranaki Regional Council
September 2022
page
© All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form without the permission of
the copyright owner(s). Such permission is only to be given in accordance with the terms of the client’s
contract with NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of
effluent by spray
irrigation onto and into land Discharge Permit 56 Puniho Road, Okato Waitapuae
25-00318-4.1 R2/0318-4.1 Dairy Glenn Farm Limited 8-May-25 Change of consent conditions
To discharge farm dairy effluent onto land... change of
conditions to increase cow numbers Discharge Permit 304 Manaia Road, Manaia Waiokura
undertaken in
the catchment during 2019 to 2020.
The existing residual flow regime supports a diverse native fish community, with
inanga, redfin bullies, longfin eels and torrentfish all present within the residual
river reach. Brown trout are also present throughout, and densities of juvenile trout
and redfin bullies in the residual reach are similar to or higher than that elsewhere
in the river. In addition to these species, banded and shortjaw
Mangamahoe, and small areas around key HEPs infrastructure. Trustpower
does not own or manage other land within the wider catchment.
3 https://shiny.niwa.co.nz/nzrivermaps/
4 https://niwa.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=933e8f24fe9140f99dfb57173087f27d
5 GNS 250K.
6 New Zealand Soil Classification
7 https://www.lawa.org.nz/explore-data/land-cover/
annotation https://shiny.niwa.co.nz/nzrivermaps/ https://shiny.niwa.co.nz/nzrivermaps/
annotation
Conclusions 64
7 Applicability 67
8 References 68
Appendix A : Hydrograph Plots
page
1
Tonkin & Taylor Ltd
Reconsenting of Mangorei Hydroelectric Power Scheme - Hydrology ReportHydrology Report
Trustpower Ltd
November 2020 (Final)
Job No: 1008726.200
1 Introduction
1.1 Context
Trustpower Ltd (TrustPower) owns and operates the Mangorei Hydroelectric Power Scheme
(Mangorei HEPS, or “MGR”), which is located mid-catchment in the Waiwhakaiho River catchment
within the Taranaki
cease the diversion and taking of water from the Waiwhakaiho
River within 30 minutes of the monitoring recorder at ‘Waiwhakaiho at Egmont Village’
(operated and maintained by the Taranaki Regional Council) recording a flow greater than or
equal to 85 cubic metres per second (as measured at 15 minute intervals).
4. The consent holder shall record the residual flow provided in the Waiwhakaiho River
downstream of the diversion weir, and shall provide records of such
Ruth Goldsmith, PhD.
Greg Ryder, PhD.
Ryder Environmental Limited
195 Rattray Street
PO Box 1023
DUNEDIN, 9054
New Zealand
Phone: 03 477 2119
Document version: 12 November 2021
Cover page: Motukawa HEPS Manganui River intake weir (background) and fish pass (foreground),
February 2020.
© All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form without the
permission of the copyright owner(s). Such permission is only to be given in accordance
restriction of fish passage in the Manganui River for
indigenous and introduced fish species as a result of the
diversion weir.
No – the diversion weir is
necessary to provide sufficient
head / impoundment to enable the
diversion of water into the
Motukawa Race. If the weir was to
be removed, or replaced with a
lower head structure, this would
require significant civil works in the
bed of the Manganui River and the
lowering of the Motukawa Race in
order to ensure there is sufficient