consideration (from the IMO
guidelines):
"The decision to allow an offshore installation, structure, or parts thereof, to remain on
the sea-bed should be based, in particular, on a case-by-case evaluation, by the coastal
State with jurisdiction over the installation or structure, of the following matters:
.1 any potential effect on the safety of surface or subsurface navigation, or of other uses
of the sea;
.2 the rate of deterioration of the material and its present and possible
refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or …
Decision of Hearing Panel Remediation NZ Ltd 26 May 2021
Decision of Hearing Panel Remediation NZ Ltd 26 May 2021
administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by NPDC, this report also
assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with NPDC’s approach to
demonstrating consent compliance in site
development of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating
as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
measured. CBODF= filtered carbonaceous biological oxygen demand
HC = hydrocarbons
2.1.4.3 20 November 2013
The sampling done on 20 November 2013 was done under low flow conditions with
3.5 mm of rain falling on the area over the previous 72 hours. The wetland was
discharging at a trickle rate at the time of sampling. On this occasion the discharge
was found to have moderate levels of CBODF and unionised ammonia. At the
compliance point (HHG000103), the levels of unionised ammonia and
Quarterly Operational Report December 2021
Candidate information handbook - Taranaki Regional Council.
the fact that the compliance point given
in the consent is on the site boundary, at which point the Stream is piped, the downstream monitoring point
is also downstream of other site discharges and further investigation is required.
page
Air quality monitoring showed that off-site there were no significant adverse effects in relation to
suspended particulates, dust deposition rates or odour beyond the site boundary.
An enclosed gas flare system was installed for air