Your search for 'rates' returned 2372 results.

Annual report 2015-2016

utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to each consent holder’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the

Annual report 2015-2016

methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance 1.1.4 Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by STDC, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects

Annual report 2014-2015

achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to each consent holder’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the

Annual report 2014-2015

consent holders during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to the Council

Annual report 2016-2017

1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the consent

Report and decision on a composting operation at Uruti (2010)

any surface water body; • The discharge does not result in surface ponding; • No spray drift enters surface water; • The discharge does not occur at a rate at which it cannot be assimilated by the soil/pasture system; and • The pasture cover within irrigation areas is maintained at all times. page 22 9. Treated wastewater discharged by irrigation to land shall not have a hydrocarbon content exceeding 5 % total petroleum hydrocarbon. 10. Discharges irrigated

Annual report 2014-2015

report also assigns a rating as to each consent holder’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the consent holder’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take

Annual report 2013-2014

holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to Council (such as

Department of Conservation Code of conduct for Minimising Acoustic Disturbance to Marine Mammals from Seismic Survey Operations 2013

as those between 30 and 180 kHz. page 132013 Code of Conduct for Minimising Acoustic Disturbance to Marine Mammals 3.8.8 Acoustic source tests Seismic source tests will be subject to the relevant soft start procedures for each survey level, though the 20-minute minimum duration does not apply. Where possible, power should be built up gradually to the required test level at a rate not exceeding that of a normal soft start. Level 1 and 2 seismic source tests with a maximum