for a further four years. 4.2 It was clarified that Council would require two additional staff in the 2020/2021 financial year. This is covered by the funding received and not rates funded. Ordinary Meeting - Executive, Audit and Risk Committee Minutes 30 page Executive, Audit and Risk Committee Meeting Monday 16 September 2019 Recommended THAT the Taranaki Regional Council: a) receives this report on participation in STRESS-3 for a further
page 72 2017/2018 Annual Plan Appendix 1: Resource Management Act Charging Policy SCHEDULE OF CHARGES PURSUANT TO SECTION 36 OF THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 SCHEDULE 1: SCALE OF CHARGES FOR STAFF TIME Rate for processing resource consents and responding to pollution incidents. Rate for all other Council work. Professional staff $90/hr $85/hr Professional/supervisory staff $114/hr $106/hr
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to the Company’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with
Rates WW noted that those projects that are important (rated high priority) will get enhanced FAR - between base FAR and 100% depending on each AO. Low cost/low risk projects (under $1m) aren’t included. VL noted advanced FAR – do it now (only available for this NLTP period). SH noted that an end of life structure would more likely gain a high rating. SB suggested safety or access related projects would be key strategies on GPS – advanced FAR. CW confirmed the Bell Block to
Agenda for Regional Transport Committee meeting November 2017.
the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in Appendix II. For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental performance and compliance for 88% of the
than previous years. In New Zealand there is a system which gives comparative rankings of genetic improvement. There are four recognised breeds: GF - Growth and Form LI - Long Internode (special purpose breed) DR - Dothistroma Resistant (fungal disease) HD - High Wood Density (special purpose breed) The breed identity code reflects the prime breeding goal(s) pursued by the breed, although growth rate and form are pursued throughout. Each seedlot can then be described as a seedlot number.
achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring
discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management
various details of the performance and extent of compliance by Osflo, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with Osflo’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely