page 62 Appendices Appendix 1: Charging Policies Resource Management Act Charging Policy Schedule of charges pursuant to section 36 of the Resource Management Act 1991 Schedule 1: Scale of charges for staff time Rate for processing resource consents and responding to pollution incidents. Rate for all other Council work. Professional staff $95/hr $90/hr Professional/supervisory staff $120/hr $112/hr Managers $174/hr $163/hr Support staff $95/hr $90/hr
other hand has the youngest population in the region with almost a quarter of its residents under the age of 15. According to the 2018 Census, 19.8% of the region’s population is Māori (up from 16.5% in 2013), with 27.6% of the population of the South Taranaki district being Māori (up from 24.3%). At the end of June 2020, the unemployment rate across the region was at 4.3% with only small variations from one district to another (compared to 4% nationally). Rates of
other hand has the youngest population in the region with almost a quarter of its residents under the age of 15. According to the 2018 Census, 19.8% of the region’s population is Māori (up from 16.5% in 2013), with 27.6% of the population of the South Taranaki district being Māori (up from 24.3%). At the end of June 2020, the unemployment rate across the region was at 4.3% with only small variations from one district to another (compared to 4% nationally). Rates of
page 5 The computer controller will not allow the cremator to be charged unless the temperature in the secondary chamber reaches 650°C and a two-second residence time is achieved. Data on residence time, emission levels, furnace pressure and rates of temperature change are used to continuously check and adjust controls to ensure maximum efficiency. A feature of the Newton cremator is a water curtain charging system. This spray system retards the start of the cremation
through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned
summer-autumn under low flow conditions during the monitoring period (at which time the Waverley system was being desludged with bio-bugs, the Manaia system had been upgraded with the addition of two wetlands, the Kaponga pond subsurface discharge rate was very low and receiving water dilution very high, and the Patea upgraded ponds system discharged continuously), or on other occasions when monitoring of impacts was required by specific consent conditions. This monitoring continued the increased
continually re-evaluate its approach and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by DAS, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and …
Health Board, provided a presentation updating the Committee. 5.2 Based on projections it is anticipated that Taranaki will reach 90% vaccination rates by Christmas. 5.3 A waste water sample that was taken on Monday from Stratford has returned a positive result. This would now indicate that this was not a person passing through Stratford and that there is a case or cases in Stratford. 5.3 Mayor Volzke, Stratford District Council, raised concerns around the mixed messaging
problem • We have used t-tests to determine whether two percentages are different from each other. With each t-test that is done, we incur a probability of a Type I error (rejection of a true null hypothesis or in other words ‘false positive’). The probability of committing a Type I error is the significance level of the test, which is set to 5%. When doing multiple tests, the Type I error rate is inflated. We have used the false discovery rate (FDR) method to control the expected proportion
Agenda for Ordinary Council meeting September 2017.