or beyond the site boundary.
Conditions 4, 5 and 6 limit the dust deposition rate beyond the site boundary; the total
particulate matter concentration of ventilated gas streams; and the effect of discharges
on the ambient suspended particulate concentration at the site boundary.
Condition 7 requires the consent to be exercised in accordance with the consent
holder’s Environmental Management Manual.
Condition 8 requires the consent holder to notify the Council prior to making any
based (SBM) drilling wastes were tested. That study is reported herein.
The key findings are:-
-high levels of salt and hydrocarbons in conjunction, or high levels of salt would cause
toxicity to earthworms;
-initial loading rates of hydrocarbons stimulate microbial action, as shown by increase in
biomass and soil respiration rates (the hydrocarbons are utilised as an energy source);
-marked reductions occurred in hydrocarbon concentrations (i.e. natural processes of
microbial degradation
based (SBM) drilling wastes were tested. That study is reported herein.
The key findings are:-
-high levels of salt and hydrocarbons in conjunction, or high levels of salt would cause
toxicity to earthworms;
-initial loading rates of hydrocarbons stimulate microbial action, as shown by increase in
biomass and soil respiration rates (the hydrocarbons are utilised as an energy source);
-marked reductions occurred in hydrocarbon concentrations (i.e. natural processes of
microbial degradation
of the performance and extent of compliance by STDC, this report also
assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with STDC’s approach to
demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of
54
Plan Review 54
Funding 55
Introduction 55
Funding sources and reasons for funding 55
Anticipated costs to the Council of implementing the Plan 55
General rate and investment revenue 55
Recovery of direct costs 55
Funding limitations 55
Glossary 57
Appendices 61
Appendix A: Pest Management Line 63
Appendix B: Self-Help Possum Control Programme (as at May 2017) 64
Appendix B(a): Mustelids Predator Control Areas (as at March 2021) 65
54
Plan Review 54
Funding 55
Introduction 55
Funding sources and reasons for funding 55
Anticipated costs to the Council of implementing the Plan 55
General rate and investment revenue 55
Recovery of direct costs 55
Funding limitations 55
Glossary 57
Appendices 61
Appendix A: Pest Management Line 63
Appendix B: Self-Help Possum Control Programme (as at May 2017) 64
Appendix B(a): Mustelids Predator Control Areas (as at March 2021) 65
483.15 524.91 235.67 452.45 504.50 376.83 394.60 336.28 452.48 452.48 5,571.98
1,503.83 1,974.83 1,955.88 1,932.59 2,099.63 819.64 1,537.16 2,017.99 1,507.31 1,578.41 1,345.13 1,809.92 1,809.92 21,892.24 Sensibility test Irrigation volume/yr 17,422
- Pumping rate M
3
/hr 30
Week 1
Reference
Production Land or on Forested
Land regulated by the NES-PF.
d) Payment of administrative charges
e) Imposition of limits on or relating to discharge or
ambient concentrations of contaminants, or on or
relating to mass discharge rates
f) Best practicable option to prevent or minimise adverse
effects beyond the boundary
g) Payment of financial contributions
Note: Appendix IX contains information on good management practices to prevent or minimise the
the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance
at the date that the asset is derecognised. The depreciation
charge for each period is recognised through the Statement of Financial Performance.
The carrying value is depreiated on a straight-line basis over its useful life. The useful life and associated depreciation rate for
the IRIS software suite is 10 years and 10%.
Where software in this category is replaced, upgraded or determined by RSHL to be of no further operational benefit, a change in
value will be recognised through the