Council to continually re-evaluate its approach
and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their
rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
provision of information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take data) in accordance
the Council to take
action on any environmental matter even if not explicitly addressed within a regional plan.
The analysis shows that the Council’s monitoring, liaison, and if needs be enforcement of
consents is very effective, achieving extremely high levels of compliance and low levels of
complaint. The average annual rate of non-compliance is barely more than 2%, or 8 events
per year. A very small number of consented sites are proving problematic; the Council
applies the full suite
discharge points; one freshwater
biomonitoring survey; two intertidal surveys; 30 deposition gauging samples; 8 nitrogen
oxides (NOx) samples and two periods of fine airborne particles (PM10) monitoring in relation
to air emissions, and auditing of monitoring data collected by Fonterra.
During the 2014-2015 year, Fonterra demonstrated a good level of environmental
performance overall.
Of the 21 consents for which compliance and environmental performance could be
categorised, 1 (5%) was rated
enables the Council to continually re-evaluate its approach and that of consent holders
to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and
considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable
development of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the Company, this report also assigns them a rating
how closely a proposal aligns with government
strategies and rates it Very High, High, Medium, Low; and
Regional Transport Committee - Mid-term review of the Regional Land Transport Plan 2015/16 - 2020/21
23
page
Cost-benefit appraisal — which helps assess value for money (for improvements it
gives a score to represent their benefit-cost ratio, and for continuous programmes, it
uses efficiency benchmarking for a rating of Very High, High, Medium, Low).
The assessment
achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring …
Guide to regulating oil and gas exploration and development activities under the Resource Management Act.
are
shown on Figure 1, attached as Appendix 1 of these consents.
Insert additional condition: minimum dissolved oxygen in the irrigation pond. Suggest 1
mg/L
Irrigation
14. From a date no later than 60 days after these consents commencing, the consent holder
shall measure and record the rate and volume of discharge from the Irrigation Pond at
intervals not exceeding 1 minute to an accuracy of +5%.
15. The consent holder shall provide the Chief Executive, Taranaki Regional