various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
3.4 Map Co-ordinates at point of discharge (either Longitude/Latitude or NZTM):
________________________ Longitude ________________________ Latitude OR
________________________ E ________________________ N (NZTM)
3.5 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice)
Longitude/Latitude or NZTM):
________________________ Longitude ________________________ Latitude OR
________________________ E ________________________ N (NZTM)
3.5 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice)
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
3.6 Assessment/Valuation number of property
very little
discussion of the effects of total allocation. The allocation in any consents is usually for the
maximum take and the sum of maximum takes for all consents is the total allocation. In practice,
most consent holders only abstract at a maximum rate for a short period of time. For example,
irrigation takes only take water in the summer and only at peak rates when it is necessary. Actual
takes are usually about 50% of the total allocation (MfE 2015). Total allocation, as
Agenda for Taranaki Regional Transport Committee 2 December 2015
enables the Council to continually re-evaluate its approach
and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for
of environmental and administrative performance 1.1.4
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating
as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is concerned with the
assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with STDC’s approach to
demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of
information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take data) in
species, often leading to a reduction in
biodiversity.
Julian's Pond, south-east of Opunake has a range of indigenous species, including nationally threatened plants.
page
1456683MB- Final Draft
163 Biodiversity
Wetland areas in the region prior to human settlement (left) compared to those mapped in 2012 (right).
‘A 60% reduction in the annual
rate of loss to wetland area.’
Wetland extent
Since the time of human settlement of New Zealand, much of the region’s original
rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in
Appendix II.
For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental
performance and compliance for 88% of the consents monitored through the Taranaki tailored