page 67 Appendices Appendix 1: Charging policies Resource Management Act charging policy Schedule of charges pursuant to section 36 of the Resource Management Act 1991 SCHEDULE 1: SCALE OF CHARGES FOR STAFF TIME Rate for processing resource consents and responding to pollution incidents. Rate for all other Council work. Professional staff $101/hr $96/hr Professional/supervisory staff $128/hr $120/hr Managers $185/hr $173/hr Support staff
is considered that Trustpower was able to demonstrate a good level of environmental performance and compliance with the resource consents, and compliance with the administrative requirements of the consents was high. The reason that the scheme did not achieve a high rating relates to the effects of the flooding that were observed in June 2015. However, it is acknowledged that there was little that Trustpower could have done different at the time to avoid or minimise this flooding and the
compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to Council (such
environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach
discharge emissions into the air at the plant site. During the monitoring period, Riverlands demonstrated an overall high level of environmental performance. Monitoring is carried out by both Riverlands and the Council. Riverlands monitors water abstraction rate, effluent flow rate and composition, receiving water quality, odour at the plant boundaries, and effluent loadings, soil, and herbage for irrigation areas. The Council undertakes inspections of the plant site and irrigation areas;
Regional representation, advocacy and investment managementCouncil 2018/19 Actual $ Council 2018/19 Budget $ Council 2017/18 Actual $ Transport 14% Hazard management 3% Recreation, culture and heritage 14% Representation, advocacy and investments 5% Resource management 44% Biosecurity 20% Other investment revenue 3% Operating revenue Government grants 8% Direct charges revenue 35% Dividends 25% Finance income 1% General rates revenue 22%
overall population has continued to increase since 2001 but the rates of growth are nowhere near what are being experienced in other faster growing regions. So the environment is not under population-induced pressure. Like any report card there are positives and negatives. The main conclusions of the report are summarised on the following pages. page 1442647 MB Final Draft. 13 Land Soil is one of Taranaki’s most important resources. Taranaki’s rural-based wealth is
Sport NZ acknowledges that Taranaki Regional Council is only mandated to act in respect of Rugby Park in New Plymouth, we know that the Council is also aware that any decisions it makes with regards to the rates it levies has a material impact on the residents of the Region and therefore on the wider network of community facilities including those relating to sport and active recreation. Any decision the Council makes regarding the redevelopment of the Stadium has an
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in Appendix II. For
continuous measurement of flow rate and temperature. Silver Fern Farms Ltd (meat processing plant) demonstrated an overall high level of environmental performance. The Company holds six resource consents, to allow it to maintain a dam in and to take from the Tawhiti Stream; to discharge to the stream and to land; and to discharge emissions into the air. During the period under review, there were no incidents reported in relation to activities at the site. Abstraction volumes complied