hydrometric equipment $680.90 per year
Tawhiti hydrometric equipment (lower) $1,730.30 per year
Tawhiti hydrometric equipment (upper) $1,070.30 per year
Waingongoro hydrometric equipment $830.50 per year
Waitaha hydrometric equipment $8,091.60 per year
Rain Gauge Calibration $336.60 per deployment
Chlorine Meter $20.80 per use
Drone $132.00 per day
Multi-parameter Field Meter $112.20 per day
Haehanga hydrometric equipment $2,383.20 per year
EXPLANATION
This scale of charges is used to
NPDC coastal structures consent monitoring report 2019-2020
this coastal area is considered ’high energy’, and also that there is
only a very narrow strip of beach (at low tide only), any waters emerging from the cliff would be swiftly
mixed and dispersed. Any effects on groundwater quality or coastal water quality would be negligible. In
general, the creation of stable interlocked layers of green waste ensures that it does not fall off, or get
blown off the cliffs and down onto the coastal marine area or into the sea.
From observations made during
of the time. There were two occasions when CCCWSL were required to use their
exceptional use limit of 79 L/s due to the reservoir levels falling below 80%. In both these instances CCCWSL
advised Council and affected parties of this requirement, as per their consent conditions. Figure 2 shows
CCCWSL’s abstraction for the 2021-2022 monitoring period.
Figure 2 CCCWSL abstraction rates for 2021-2022
2.4 Hydrological inspections and residual flow assessment
CCCWSL provides telemetered
Lower Waiwhakaiho Catchment Annual Report 2022-2023
… page
STRATFORD
WAITARA
Provisional data only
P TEAĀ
NEW PLYMOUTH
ŌPUNAKE
ELTHAM
MANAIA
H WERAĀ
Tota (mm)l rainfall to date
KEY
xxx yy%
INGLEWOOD
Pohokura
Saddle
Dawson Falls
Cape Egmont
Stratford
Whareroa
P teaā
North Egmont
Inglewood
Motunui
Brooklands
Kaka Rd
K tareō
Rimunui
Glenn Rd
Huinga
9 %4
101%
106%
10 %5
104%
117%125%
112%
125%
100%
122%
109%
1677
2024
2225
2468
Council that the ground conditions
were in line with the consent conditions (23 and 24) of the expired consent. Further, a stormwater sample
page
16
was collected from pooled rain water which demonstrated no elevated contaminants were present in the
sample. The Council’s position was that the works did not result in any on-going discharge of contaminants
to the environment as a process of the skimmer pit development.
Additional surface water samples are proposed in the
as
significant enough to move to option 2. Government support for the increased costs
was requested. The Council will continue to explore avenues for additional funding
of these costs, but ultimately they fall on the general ratepayer.
A number of submitters wanted the Council to go further and quicker with
particularly heavier involvement of Māori in decision-making and implementation of
the changes. This latter issue is being addressed through the Ensuring Māori
Groundwater Quality State of the Environment Monitoring 2015-2020