Drawing detailing the activity
(state where in the AEE the information can be located) AEE Page Number Section
Please provide details and attach plans of the proposed activity.
Include dimensions eg depth of excavation, deposits and a real extent
Please also complete Section H
page
05/24 - Doc # 3115168 Page 14 of 20
SECTION F – Other structures
Please note this section is for all other structures that don’t fall into the
this coastal area is considered ’high energy’, and also that there is
only a very narrow strip of beach (at low tide only), any waters emerging from the cliff would be swiftly
mixed and dispersed. Any effects on groundwater quality or coastal water quality would be negligible. In
general, the creation of stable interlocked layers of green waste ensures that it does not fall off, or get
blown off the cliffs and down onto the coastal marine area or into the sea.
From observations made during
irrigation in Taranaki does take place within Zones 2, 3, 4 and 5, which represents a
10 km wide belt of coastal land stretching from Oakura to Waitotara.
1.1.7 Irrigation systems
In general there are two types of irrigation methods; surface and pressurised. The majority of irrigation
systems currently in operation in the region fall in to the pressurised category. Pressurised systems can be
further differentiated based on the method of operation and equipment used. A summary of the systems
Guide to regulating oil and gas exploration and development activities under the Resource Management Act.
Regional Transport Committee agenda December 2020
hydrometric equipment $830.50 per year
Waitaha hydrometric equipment $8,091.60 per year
Rain Gauge Calibration $336.60 per deployment
Chlorine Meter $20.80 per use
Drone $132.00 per day
Multi-parameter Field Meter $112.20 per day
Haehanga hydrometric equipment $2,383.20 per year
EXPLANATION
This scale of charges is used to calculate the Council's actual and reasonable costs when carrying out functions
under the Resource Management Act 1991. Where those actual and
Cheal Production Station Annual Report 2023-24
12:40 8.7 28.2 7.7 12.9 24 0.5 0.052 2.4 0.016
3 13:33 9.1 28.2 7.9 11.6 21 0.4 0.041 2.4 0.02
4 13:50 9 28.1 7.9 11.6 20 < 0.4 0.037 2.4 0.016
The results of sampling show little difference between the upstream and downstream sites with regard to
the parameters tested on the dates sampled, with the exception of total BOD. Variation between sampling
dates related largely to recent rain events in the catchment. As has been observed in some previous
surveys, several surveys in the 2018-2019
NPDC coastal structures consent monitoring report 2019-2020
Council that the ground conditions
were in line with the consent conditions (23 and 24) of the expired consent. Further, a stormwater sample
page
16
was collected from pooled rain water which demonstrated no elevated contaminants were present in the
sample. The Council’s position was that the works did not result in any on-going discharge of contaminants
to the environment as a process of the skimmer pit development.
Additional surface water samples are proposed in the