December 2022
The camp was quiet at the time of inspection with only one caravan on site. There were no odours or visual
issues near the WWTP or trenches. The sea was rough (BF3) with strong onshore winds. The WWTP
appeared to be operating in compliance with its consent conditions at the time of inspection.
19 January 2023
The monitoring inspection was completed late this month due to heavy rain prior which may have masked
any effects from the WWTP. The camp was reasonably busy at the
abstraction permit (groundwater)
Section 14 of the RMA stipulates that no person may take, use, dam or divert any water, unless the activity is
expressly allowed for by a resource consent or a rule in a regional plan, or it falls within some particular
categories set out in Section 14.
Petrochem Limited holds water permit 10295-1 to cover the taking of groundwater, as ‘produced water’,
during hydrocarbon exploration and production activities at the Kowhai-D wellsite. This permit was issued
by the
on 2 May 2018 38
Table 8 Chemical analysis of the Puremu Stream, sampled on 31 May 2018 40
Table 9 Results of metal analysis undertaken on 2 May 2018 41
Table 10 Results of metal analysis undertaken on 31 May 2018 42
Table 11 Results of rain event monitoring – discharge and Puremu Stream samples, 28 June 2018 44
Table 12 Results of rain event monitoring - Manganaha Stream, 28 June 2018 45
Table 13 Biomonitoring sites in the Puremu and Manganaha Streams related to the
activities
It is possible that flaring may occur during the following activities:
• Well testing and clean-up;
• Production testing;
• Emergencies; and
• Maintenance and enhancement activities (well workovers).
1.3 Resource consents
1.3.1 Water abstraction permit (groundwater)
Section 14 of the RMA stipulates that no person may take, use, dam or divert any
water, unless the activity is expressly allowed for by resource consent or a rule in a
regional plan, or it falls
Lower Waiwhakaiho Annual Report 2020-2021
by NPDC that relate to the Colson Road landfill 14
Table 2 Monitoring programme objectives and programme development methodology 15
Table 3 Summary of monitoring activity for 2022-2023 16
page
iii
Table 4 Chemical analysis of Colson Road landfill combined site leachate discharge 33
Table 5 Results of analysis of under liner drainage for the year under review. 35
Table 6 Results of rain event monitoring – discharge and Puremu Stream samples, 1 June 2023 40
Councillor B K Raine
Councillor C S Williamson
Councillor D L Lean (ex officio)
Councillor D N MacLeod (ex officio)
Representative Ms E Bailey (Iwi Representative)
Members Mr J Hooker (Iwi Representative)
Mrs B Muir (Taranaki Federated Farmers)
Councillor P Nixon (South Taranaki District Council)
Mr M Ritai (Iwi Representative)
Apologies Councillor G Boyde (Stratford District Council)
Councillor R Jordan (New Plymouth District Council)
Notification of Late Items
Item
Road 6.5 29.1 1,891.5
Arawhata 21.0 16.3 3,423
Centre 34.0 12.2 4,146
Ron’s 14.0 29.8 4,172
Sand dunes 21 31.6 6,636
Cliff tops 8.5 24.3 2,065.5
Total 105 - 22,334
2.3.2.3 Method of irrigation
The effluent from the piggery is pumped to storage pond prior to land application. The Company
communicated that three different delivery systems were used during the 2020-2021 monitoring year:
1. ‘Weta’ travelling rain gun, this was utilised to apply effluent at depths of
Resource consents
1.3.1 Water abstraction permit
Section 14 of the RMA stipulates that no person may take, use, dam or divert any water, unless the activity is
expressly allowed for by a resource consent or a rule in a regional plan, or it falls within some particular
categories set out in Section 14.
Civil Quarries Ltd holds water permit 10247-1.0 to cover the abstraction of groundwater incidental to
quarry operations and for aggregate washing purposes. This permit was issued by the
the management of any stormwater and leachate.
page
7
2 Results
2.1 Inspections
6 June 2017
A site inspection was carried out during fine weather. The site was relatively dry (110 mm of rain had fallen
over the past month).
A small amount of green waste had been deposited by Fulton Hogan and Ingrams Contracting. No green
waste had been deposited from the STDC Patea green waste holding facility (the Patea transfer station).
Most of the green waste had