of consent holders
to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and
considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable
development of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as
to the Company’s environmental and
resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and consent performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as
to the Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is
compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
provision of information to Council (such …
management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by NPDC, this report
also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental
consisting of
primarily water/synthetic based cuttings and fluids, with smaller quantities of
contaminated water and soil. The waste spread was sourced from the Mangahewa C
and D, Sidewinder, Puka and KA-1 wellsites and Cheal production station. On the
basis of average TPH concentrations the waste was spread at the 100mm application
rate over an area of 13,900 m2 (area F1, Figure 2 below).
page
11
F
ig
u
re
2
V
a
n
n
e
r L
a
n
d
fa
rm
s
ite
a
c
fenced and retired 12.3 hectares of
grazed land, 12.6 hectares of native bush and 8.5 hectares of
manuka forestry. This involved 2.7 kilometres of fencing.
They’ve also planted 261 poplar poles.
By improving better-producing areas such as river terraces to
increase pasture growth, the Sandfords have maintained their
stocking rate even though the total grazing area has been
reduced.
They regularly control goats, pigs, deer, possums and stoats by
trapping, poisoning
waste and domestic rubbish, was not related to Consent 3769-3. As a result, the
abatement notice did not affect the rating of STDC in relation to environmental
performance of the sewage treatment system at Wai-inu (Consent 3769-3) which was
‘high’ for the 2011-2013 monitoring period.
page
7
Photo 1 Ponding of water on top of the sand filters during the December 2014 inspection
Photo 2 Adjustment of the pump station during the December 2014 inspection
is buffeted by high winds and waves
from the west, and parts of the coastline are eroding significantly. However, the location, severity and rate of
coastal erosion are influenced by factors such as the local geology and orientation of the location, the supply
of sediment to and along the coast, and the influence of artificial structures such as breakwaters and
sea walls.
The effects of climate change such as rising sea levels, wave patterns, storminess, and increased sediment
within 3m above the normal
level in water flow of any
such WATERCOURSE
(refer to Diagram 10.2 in
Appendix 10)
n/a 1) Impact on flood detention capacity.
2) Impact on rate and direction of flood flow, especially
whether the STRUCTURE prevents the free passage of
water flow.
3) Potential for scouring or accelerated erosion to occur due to
changes in flow regime.
4) Proposed design of BUILDINGS including minimum floor
levels relative to predicted 2% AEP flood levels.
5) The health
groundwater table, BTW Company staff
undertook two bore permeability tests on the monitoring bores GND 2188 and GND 2190 (January
8th 2015).
The ‘slug test’ method requires removal of a set amount of water, where after recovery of water
levels is timed with a stopwatch. The four litre ‘slug’ was removed by a high rate vacuum pump,
and the recovering water level was determined with a calibrated electronic dip tape. Both
monitoring bores did not fully recover to their initial water levels after