(chlorophyll a 200
mg/m2) from 2025 onwards. The Council’s long-established chlorophyll a sampling protocol differs from
that established more recently for the NOF guideline and therefore results cannot be directly translated to
NOF bands. The Council is now also conducting a NOF-aligned periphyton monitoring programme.
Long-term trends in periphyton cover have been analysed using a combination of the Mann-Kendall
technique, a 5% significance level, and a Benjamini-Hochberg False Discovery Rate …
Committee
SDC Stratford District Council
SH State Highway
SHIP State Highway Investment Proposal
SIG Special Interest Group (regional sector of LGNZ)
SIP Speed and Infrastructure Programme
SMP Speed Management Plan
SPR Special Purpose Road
STDC South Taranaki District Council
STE Stock Truck Effluent
SSBC Single Stage Business Case
TEFAR Targeted Enhanced Financial Assistance Rate
TIO Transport Investment Online
TP Transport Programme
TRC Taranaki
_________________________________________________________________________________
3.3 Map Co-ordinates at point of discharge (either Longitude/Latitude or NZTM):
________________________ Longitude ________________________ Latitude OR
________________________ E ________________________ N (NZTM)
3.4 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice)
_________________________________________________________________________________
stormwater discharges from the northern and
southern stormwater outfalls, Inhalable Grade Lactose (IGL) plant, and stormwater detention ponds, and
infringement notice was issued in relation to the breach of the consent.
Particulate deposition from air emissions was, in general, similar to the previous monitoring periods. At the
monitoring site east of the southern stormwater pond the lactose deposition rate was found to be 20% over
the guideline value. No complaints were received and visual
the refinement of methods and
considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable
development of the region’s resources.
Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance 1.1.4
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the Trust, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and
administrative performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned
critical infrastructure using the methodology
described in Section 1.4, rating assets as nationally, regionally and locally significant.
As a minimum, the data provided included spatial (locational information), asset type and a criticality
rating. At the first project workshop, the criticality assessment process was discussed so that a
reasonably consistent approach was taken across the lifelines sector.
2. Collection of regional hazard information
The most accurate and
must satisfy.
The Council’s monitoring during the year under review included 21 inspections, two
deposition gauge surveys, and review of two stack test reports.
The deposition gauge surveys found that, in relation to dust resulting in deposited
particulates, ambient air quality in the area during the year under review was very good.
During the 2014-2015 year 13 % of the “TRC SEM” samples1 analysed exceeded the 4g/m2/30
days deposition rate guideline, with only 24% of all the gauges
responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Consent holder’s environmental and administrative performance
during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on
Evaluation of environmental and consent performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance
by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a
rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the
receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year.
Administrative performance is concerned with the
of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance