consent requirements for the vast
majority of the period being reported. During the reported period, the Company was fully compliant with
their residual flow limits, lake levels, and the rise and recession rate restrictions for the lower Patea River.
The Company was required to coordinate a number of investigations and reports during the reporting
period. The bulk of the monitoring work required in relation to these was undertaken prior to the 2017-2018
period and those results have been
performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
provision of …
methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely
significant confusion in
the community.
• Some permitted activity standards are also arguably redundant. For example, the permitted
activity standards under regulation 13 for stockholding areas require the area be sealed so that
Policy and Planning Committee - Opportunities for Freshwater Reform
14
page
water cannot permeate faster than a certain rate and the area be 50m away from any water
body or drain. If an area is appropriately sealed and effluent appropriately
consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under
List of tables
Table 1 Summary of consents held by the Company for the Motukawa HEP scheme 5
Table 2 Gauging results for gaugings undertaken in relation to the Manganui River residual flow 12
Table 3 Details of consents and special conditions in relation to abstraction rates, discharge rates and
water levels and the recording 13
Table 4 Summary of summer Manganui River daily water temperatures (°C) prior to the increase in
residual flow to 400 L/s (1992-2002) and for the years since,
2.2. Location of activity (Including: Street/road name, number, and locality):
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
2.3. Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice):
_________________________________________________________________________________
2.4. Assessment/Valuation number of property
stormwater discharges from the northern and
southern stormwater outfalls, Inhalable Grade Lactose (IGL) plant, and stormwater detention ponds, and
infringement notice was issued in relation to the breach of the consent.
Particulate deposition from air emissions was, in general, similar to the previous monitoring periods. At the
monitoring site east of the southern stormwater pond the lactose deposition rate was found to be 20% over
the guideline value. No complaints were received and visual
the refinement of methods and
considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable
development of the region’s resources.
Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance 1.1.4
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the Trust, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and
administrative performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned
must satisfy.
The Council’s monitoring during the year under review included 21 inspections, two
deposition gauge surveys, and review of two stack test reports.
The deposition gauge surveys found that, in relation to dust resulting in deposited
particulates, ambient air quality in the area during the year under review was very good.
During the 2014-2015 year 13 % of the “TRC SEM” samples1 analysed exceeded the 4g/m2/30
days deposition rate guideline, with only 24% of all the gauges