tailored monitoring programmes, while for another 96 (10%) of the consents a good level of environmental
performance and compliance was achieved. A further 27 (3%) of consents monitored required improvement
in their performance, while the remaining one (<1%) achieved a rating of poor.
In terms of overall environmental and compliance performance by the consent holder over the last several
years, this report shows that the consent holder’s performance remains at a high level in the year under
review.
For reference, in the 2022-2023 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental
performance and compliance for 878 (87%) of a total of 1007 consents monitored through the Taranaki
tailored monitoring programmes, while for another 96 (10%) of the consents a good level of environmental
performance and compliance was achieved. A further 27 (3%) of consents monitored required improvement
in their performance, while the remaining one (<1%) achieved a rating of
monitoring programmes, while for another 96 (10%) of the consents a good level of environmental
performance and compliance was achieved. A further 27 (3%) of consents monitored required improvement
in their performance, while the remaining one (<1%) achieved a rating of poor.
In terms of overall environmental and compliance performance by the consent holder over the last several
years, this report shows that the consent holder’s performance remains at a high level in the year under
review.
table, however this is able to be
provided by assessors if they feel it is beneficial. Te Tangi a te Manu does emphasise under 6.24: In
any event, such descriptors do not replace the need to describe the specific nature of the effect, rate
its magnitude, and explain the reasons. It should be noted that the LVEA does provide description of
the nature of effect and explains reasoning for its rated magnitude and as such is considered
consistent with Te Tangi a te Manu.
In summary the landscape
environmental
performance and compliance for 878 (87%) of a total of 1007 consents monitored through the Taranaki
tailored monitoring programmes, while for another 96 (10%) of the consents a good level of environmental
performance and compliance was achieved. A further 27 (3%) of consents monitored required improvement
in their performance, while the remaining one (<1%) achieved a rating of poor.
In terms of overall environmental and compliance performance by the consent holder over the last several
CDEM Joint Committee Agenda March 2023 Web
_________________________________________________________________________________
3.4. Map Co-ordinates at point of activity (either Longitude/Latitude or NZTM)
________________________ Longitude ________________________ Latitude OR
________________________ E ________________________ N (NZTM)
3.5. Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice)
_________________________________________________________________________________
3.6. Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to
________________________ Latitude OR
________________________ E ________________________ N (NZTM)
3.4 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice)
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
3.5 Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to land title or rates notice)
(NZTM)
3.4 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice)
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
3.5 Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to land title or rates notice)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
3.6 What is