RMA, but the
nature and extent of such measures remains, of
necessity, a matter for regional council/community to
determine under the LGA processes.
Of note regional councils may also use section 85 of
the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 to provide for
rates remission for land that has high biodiversity value
where they have a policy to do so under section 109 of
the same Act.
2.3 Other agencies’ statutory
mandate
A large number of agencies and
compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
provision of information to Council (such …
environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on
Tapuae Roa - Make Way for Taranaki Action Plan April 2018.
development of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and
administrative performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
Discovery Rate (FDR) is defined as the expected proportion of true
hypothesis rejected out of the total number of rejections. This can occur when
multiple correlations are undertaken, as there is a chance that some of these will be
found to be significant purely by chance – i.e. the overall Type I error rate is inflated.
The most powerful method of dealing with this problem was advocated by
Benjamini & Hochberg (1995). FDR analysis was applied to the p-values obtained
while undertaking long-term
of consent holders
to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and
considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable
development of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as
to the Company’s environmental and
resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and consent performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as
to the Company’s environmental and administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving
environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
performance is
within 3m above the normal
level in water flow of any
such WATERCOURSE
(refer to Diagram 10.2 in
Appendix 10)
n/a 1) Impact on flood detention capacity.
2) Impact on rate and direction of flood flow, especially
whether the STRUCTURE prevents the free passage of
water flow.
3) Potential for scouring or accelerated erosion to occur due to
changes in flow regime.
4) Proposed design of BUILDINGS including minimum floor
levels relative to predicted 2% AEP flood levels.
5) The health