discharges treated water from the final aerobic pond into the neighbouring Waiongana Stream in compliance with the conditions of Consent 0715-4. page 5 Figure 1 Location of DH Lepper Trust piggery and Lepperton 1.3 Resource consents Water abstraction permit Section 14 of the RMA stipulates that no person may take, use, dam or divert any water, unless the activity is expressly allowed for by a resource consent or a rule in a regional plan, or it falls within some
McIntyre B K Raine N W Walker C S Williamson Apologies Notification of Late Items Item Page Subject Item 1 5 PowerCo Presentation to the Taranaki Regional Council - PowerCo's 2018-2023 Investment Proposal Item 2 19 Confirmation of Minutes Item 3 26 Consents and Regulatory Committee Minutes Item 4 32 Policy and Planning Committee Minutes Item 5 38 Executive, Audit and Risk Committee Minutes Item 6 44 Draft 2017/2018 Annual Plan - Statement of Proposal
2020 The fill area was coming to the end of fill capacity. No inappropriate material was observed. It was noted that the first of the three silt fences needed to be repaired. Although it was fine during the inspection, it had rained heavily prior to arrival, no issues were noted with regards to stormwater or visually in the receiving water. No dust or odours were noted. 20 May 2021 No activity was occurring on the site during the inspection. There were some piles of soil at the top
station, but a large puddle was present between the pump station and camp sites after heavy rain preceding. The flow book was sighted and current. The trenches were not inspected due to high winds. The camp appeared to be operating in compliance with its consent conditions at the time of inspection. Inspection 2 – 10 January 2022 The camp was busy at the time of the inspection with lots of people on site and staying in the converted containers. The baches were also busy with lots of groups
regional plan, or it falls within some particular categories set out in Section 14. The Company holds water permit 10247-1 to cover the abstraction of groundwater incidental to quarry operations and for aggregate washing purposes. This permit was issued by the Council to the previous site operators (Inglewood Metal Ltd) on 1 December 2016 under Section 87(d) of the RMA. The permit was then transferred to The Company on 6 April 2017. page 5 Figure 1 Quarry operations,
year Standard hydrometric equipment $1,772.00 per year Tangahoe hydrometric equipment $619.00 per year Tawhiti hydrometric equipment (lower) $1,573.00 per year Tawhiti hydrometric equipment (upper) $973.00 per year Waingongoro hydrometric equipment $755.00 per year Waitaha hydrometric equipment $7,356.00 per year Rain Gauge Calibration $306.00 per deployment Chlorine Meter $18.90 per use Multi-parameter Field Meter $102.00 per day EXPLANATION This scale of charges is used to
NPDC NP wastewater treatment plant consent monitoring report - Taranaki Regional Council.
of the stream however ongoing development since 2016 has resulted in more sites on the eastern side. These sites fall under permitted activity rules and are not covered by this monitoring report. Upstream, land use is pastoral and horticultural. Downstream, the Mangati flows through the residential area of Bell Block. The Mangati Reserve (Photo 1), with its popular well maintained walkway, borders the stream immediately below the industrial area. The beach at the mouth of the stream is also
production or the main pipeline could have major effects on the national economy. 5. Greater reliance on services and infrastructure within urban areas for the general public. 6. Isolation and access to food for smaller towns within the region. 7. A disaster could have a major effect on the regional economy (particularly oil and gas and agriculture), therefore planning for prompt recovery will be a priority. 8. Ash fall in an eruption of Mt Taranaki is highly likely to contaminate water
consent or a rule in a regional plan, or it falls within some particular categories set out in Section 14. As Greymouth Petroleum Limited was unable to estimate the rate or volume of the take, and as such, may exceed the limits of the permitted activity Rule [Rule 48 of the RFWP], the take of groundwater fell for consideration under Rule 49 of the RFWP as a controlled activity. The standards of Rule 49 require that: • The abstraction shall cause not more than a 10% lowering of