scale and can be interpreted as applying to a section of
river segments in an FMU, rather than a specific monitoring site.
FMU-based baseline states (expressed as percentages of stream lengths) for the macroinvertebrate numeric
attribute states are shown in Table 6. Maps of stream widths under each NOF band for all three numeric
attribute states are in Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11.
Table 6: FMU-based baseline states for the macroinvertebrate numeric attribute states (MCI,
FMU-based baseline states (expressed as percentages of stream lengths) for the macroinvertebrate numeric
attribute states are shown in Table 6. Maps of stream widths under each NOF band for all three numeric
attribute states are in Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11.
Table 6: FMU-based baseline states for the macroinvertebrate numeric attribute states (MCI, QMCI, ASPM) expressed as percentage
waterway length in each FMU within each NOF attribute band.
NOF Band
No.
sites
MCI
stormwater discharge consent 5349-1 46
Table 10 Summary of performance for dam and diversion consent 5350-1 47
Table 11 Summary of performance for structures consent 5351-1 48
List of figures
Figure 1 Regional map of Taranaki showing the location of the Central landfill site 3
Figure 2 Aerial view of the Central landfill site and sampling points, up to June 2017 12
Figure 3 Increased Central landfill monitoring network, July 2017 onward 13
Figure 4 Central landfill surface
site activity .................................................................................................................... 7
3.1 Site map .................................................................................................................................................... 7
3.2 Description of the site activity ................................................................................................................ 8
3.3 Composting operation
3953-3 43
Table 16 Chemical analysis of samples taken in the vicinity of the Patea closed
landfill site 48
Table 17 Summary of performance for Patea closed landfill stormwater and
leachate consent 0427-3 49
Table 18 Summary of performance for Patea closed landfill air discharge
consent 4636-2 50
Table 19 Summary of performance for Patea closed landfill stormwater and
sediment consent 7268-1 51
List of figures
Figure 1 Regional map of STDC landfills 5
Figure 2 Eltham
usefulness for monitoring purposes is studied as at
the moment they are uncapped and opened to the surface. It is possible that the water
samples from the wells encountered may be representative of different water-yielding
zones within the same aquifer; however, the data that could be obtained from them could
be used as up-gradient baseline conditions.
Unfortunately there is not enough topographical information available to determine
groundwater flow-lines and potentiometric groundwater maps
Investigation of the
items in this inventory may mean more archaeological sites are considered in future district
plan reviews.
The greatest number of archaeological sites identified is in South Taranaki. These 976 sites are shown
individually on STDC district planning maps but no specific information about the sites is included in
the South Taranaki District Plan.
The majority of archaeological
sites in Taranaki are on private
land and the condition of sites
varies. A number of
substance in, on
or under the foreshore or
seabed for other purposes
C3.7 • Deposit is in volumes of more than 50 000 cubic metres at a site in
any 12 month period, other than as provided for by rule C3.8.
Discretionary 1.1(d), 2.1, 2.3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 6.6,
7.4, 8.1, 9.10, 11.1, 11.2, 13.1,
14.1, 14.2, 14.3
C3.8 • Deposit is in volumes of more than 50 000 cubic metres in the area
marked `Spoil Disposal Area' on Map 7 of this plan, in any 12 month
period.
Discretionary 1.1(d),
Table 26 Summary of performance for Taranaki Trucking Company
Limited’s cleanfill consent 5561-1 69
Table 27 Summary of performance for Taranaki Trucking Company
Limited’s culvert consent 6280-1 70
List of figures
Figure 1 Regional map showing the locations of the cleanfills
monitored under this programme during the year under
review 5
Figure 2 AA Contracting Limited’s cleanfill and sampling sites at
Henwood Road, New Plymouth 11
Figure 3 A & A George Family
Trustpower Patea Hydroelectric Power Scheme consent monitoring report 2018-2019