page page Project Number 420W1016 DISCLAIMER This report has been prepared by the Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited (GNS Science) exclusively for and under contract to Taranaki Regional Council. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by GNS Science, GNS Science accepts no responsibility for any use of or reliance on any contents of this report by any person other than Taranaki Regional Council and shall not be liable to any person other
Id Client Reference mwatson0l3 Search Copy Dated 11/08/16 12: ! 7pm, Page 2 of 2 Register Only page Date Printed: 04-0ctober-2017 Taranaki Regional Xplorer accepts no respnnsibility for incomplete or inaccurate information containad on this map. Use of this website is subject to, and constitutes acceptance of the conditions set out in our disclaimer, This publicaUon is copyright reserved by Taranaki Regional Xplorer. Cadastral and Topographic information is derived from
… These awards highlight and celebrate mighty efforts right across the community. The actions of the winners and many others like them are a major reason that Taranaki enjoys a generally good and improving environment. Farmers, businesses and Councils are spending millions to protect and enhance the environment, and just as important is the hours and sweat invested by volunteers, as individuals or groups, in projects big and small, and the work of teachers striving to
National Park. The site consists of approx. 63ha of cut over or well regenerated native bush remnants which are occasionally separated by clearings or fingers of pasture. The site has been identified as a priority for management as a good example of MF8-3: Kahikatea, rimu, kamahi forest. This forest type is considered Reduced with less than 50% of this type of forest remaining in Taranaki. Notable vegetation includes a number of ‘Threatened’ species such as swamp maire, and three species of
page S c h o o l s i n t h e e n v i r o n m e n t n e w s l e t t e r S IT E A U G U S T 2 0 8 IS S U E N O .8 6 1Regional Council Taranaki This and That OUT F Making compost with Kaponga Primary and Hawera Primary For assistance or information on environmental education contact: Emily Roberts, Education Officer Taranaki Regional Council Private Bag 713, Stratford 4352 Ph: 06 765 7127 Fax: 06 765 5097
guideline limits for long filaments (refer Table 1 for all results). For the TRC Periphyton Index, the median index value for 2012-2014 monitoring showed that 13 sites (62%) recorded ‘Very good’ rating, 7 sites (33%) recorded ‘Good’ rating, and one site (5%) recorded ‘moderate’ rating. None were in a ‘poor’ or ‘very poor’ condition of periphyton proliferation. Table 1: Summary of SEM periphyton results for 2012-2014 monitoring year C at ch - m en t River/Stream Site Median
of whitebait upstream of the weir. It is unknown whether these whitebait were juvenile inanga or a climbing species such as banded kokopu or koaro. These observations suggest that at times, under certain conditions, fish passage is possible through the intake tunnels. Observations made at the scheme found that a high lake level produces the slowest velocities through the intake tunnels and where water enters the intake tunnels, there is minimal change in water level (Photo 1). It is
myrtle species being listed as Threatened or at Risk. Three climbing rata species from the Myrtle family are present at this site and are listed nationally as 'Threatened'. Representativeness - High The remnants are of a forest type that is now rare in Taranaki (WF13 Tawa, kohekohe, rewarewa, hinau, podocarp forest, <20% original extent remaining in region). Contains indigenous vegetation on F5.2b and H1.3a- 'Acutely Threatened' LENZ environments. page Ecological Context -
for agricultural impacts ($million) ..........23 Table 15: Sensitivity tests of outcomes by option ........................................................25 page Page v Executive Summary A freshwater plan (the Regional Fresh Water Plan for Taranaki, or RFWP) has been in effect in Taranaki since October 2001, and Taranaki Regional Council is currently reviewing this plan. As part of the review the Council is assessing the economic costs and benefits of including
to farm At farm gate check the compliance history on laptop Enter the property and take every practicable measure to locate the consent holder (farm owner) or occupier (sharemilker/worker) to notify the inspection. Show warrant. Establish cow numbers being milked and compare with consent limit. Check dairy shed to ensure facility discharges to a sump. This includes adjoining races that may be washed and the sand trap. Also check the stormwater diversion device. Follow