Prolonged and/or heavy rainfall will often result in high
levels of enterococci in the samples as these are washed down flooded streams and rivers from farmland.
This can be exacerbated by a low tide where a sea sample collected from a site near a stream mouth may
contain a high proportion of freshwater.
Water quality at Middleton Bay
Contact recreational bacteriological water quality at Middleton Bay was monitored by the Council on 22
separate occasions between early November 2023 and late
daily average results fell
into the Ministry's 'excellent' or 'good' categories and 41% of the results met the 'acceptable'
category. Six daily results from the total 138 of days monitored fell into the ‘alert’ category. It
is noted that all of those six results happened during moderate to heavy rainfall events, and
in the majority of cases, during fresh onshore winds. These findings confirm those of the
previous inhalable particulate surveys that found sea salt spray to be a major PM10 source.
cyanobacteria were higher than in the previous
three seasons, and similar to the preceding two seasons, probably a reflection of the relative amounts of
rainfall causing freshes that scour streambeds of periphyton.
page
Timely reporting of the results of bacteriological water quality and cyanobacteria numbers/cover was
undertaken by use of the Taranaki Regional Council website (www.trc.govt.nz) and LAWA website
(www.lawa.org.nz), as well as liaison with territorial local
2019-2020 monitoring year, with most
commencing irrigation in late October and concluding in March. Rainfall recorded at the Council’s
monitoring locations over the summer irrigation period ranged between 85% and 114% of historical mean
values. Total usage during the 2019-2020 irrigation season, across all exercised irrigation consents was 8,835
ML. This was more than that used during the preceding 2018-2019 monitoring year, when 56 irrigation
consents were exercised, and a total usage of 6,906 ML. …
CDEM Joint Committee March 2024
boundary – bank erosion
page
i
Table of contents
Page
1. Purpose 1
2. Introduction 1
3. Background 1
3.1 Ring plain 1
3.2 Elevation 2
3.3 Stability 3
3.4 Rainfall 3
3.5 Run off 4
3.6 Channels 4
4. Legal status and background 6
4.1 Ownership 6
4.2 Control 6
4.3 Land ownership 6
4.4 Catchment authorities 7
4.5 Regional Water Boards 7
4.6 Control of gravel extraction 7
5. Geology 8
6. Watercourses 9
7. Event/effect relationship 10
(the Council) to assess the environmental
performance during the period under review, and the results and effects of the consent
holder’s activities.
The Council’s monitoring programme included three regular inspections, one additional
inspection, and two biological receiving water surveys. Three short duration overflows (four
to nine days) following prolonged and intensive rainfall events, occurred between mid April
and late June 2015.
Regular inspections indicated no problems
rainfall sites recorded figures well above their
averages for the three winter months. Our site
at Patea recorded rainfall figures that were 167%
above its average amount for those months, yet
it was still the driest of our 27 rainfall monitoring
sites around the region. Perhaps you could spare
a thought for the people working in the Dawson
Falls area, as a staggering 2,723mls of rain fell at
that site over the winter period.
Congratulations to the 55 schools, 51 early
2018-June 2019) 9
Figure 4 Daily abstraction volumes under consent 7470-1.2 (July 2009-June 2019) 10
Figure 5 Maximum daily abstraction rate under consent 7470-1.2 (July 2009-June 2019) 10
Figure 6 Observed groundwater levels GND2102 and rainfall (July 2018-June 2019) 11
Figure 7 Observed groundwater levels GND2102 and abstraction (July 2018-June 2019) 12
Figure 8 Observed groundwater levels GND2103 and rainfall (July 2018-June 2019) 12
Figure 9 Observed groundwater levels