Co-ordinates at point of discharge (either Longitude/Latitude or NZTM):
Longitude _ Latitude OR
/7J /7^ _ E ^-^57.9^ N (NZTM)
3. 5 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice)
ft^f Se&ho^ ^ /3/oil^ // Ufffjer 44//ff. r^
~n
3.6 Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to land title or rates notice)
r^^i//^^1
07/17-i»623858
Page 3 of 16
page
3. 7 If the discharge is to water, name the river or stream that the discharge goes to or
With all three proposals included in
the 2017/2018 Annual Plan, general rates will go up 1% as opposed to the 0.5% rise forecast for
2017/2018 in the 2015/2025 Long-Term Plan.
This Consultation Document sets out the details and implications of what we’re proposing in these
three specific areas, and how you can tell us what you think about them before we make final
decisions.
You can make a submission by letter, by email, or via our website, www.trc.govt.nz. If you
River, two
consents to discharge effluent and solids to land, two consents for structures in watercourses, and one
consent to discharge emissions into the air at the plant site.
Monitoring is carried out by both the Company and the Council. The Company monitors water abstraction
rate, effluent flow rate and composition, receiving water quality, odour at the plant boundaries, effluent
loadings and soil and herbage for irrigation areas. The Council undertakes inspections of the plant site and
viable.
To assess where irrigation may be viable modelling of irrigation demand was carried
out. Only land with a slope less than 15 degrees and that is currently classified as
‘productive farmland’ was considered. Weather and soil water holding data was then
analysed and parameters around irrigation application rates and reliability of supply
were applied.
For the cost benefits of irrigation to be determined the pasture yield response to
irrigation was assessed using the AusFarm
details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the
assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
provision of information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take data)
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
to
plantings and the environment, while
maximising weed control.
GROUND PREPARATION
(pre-plant spraying)
Clear away all grass and weed competition
before planting. Rank vegetation can be
spot-sprayed with a knock-down herbicide
containing the active ingredient glyphosate
eg. Roundup G2. Glyphosate has low
toxicity to wildlife and soil organisms, and
breaks down fast. Spray three or preferably
four weeks before plants go in. Use
Roundup at a rate of 10 ml per litre of
water (for
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in
Appendix II.
For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental
performance and compliance for 88% of the consents monitored through
the
region’s resources.
1.1.4. Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by SDC, this report also
assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is