comprising 18% of the district’s population. Iwi and hapū of the Taranaki region
are Ngāti Maniapoto, Ngaa Rauru Kiitahi, Ngāruahine, Ngāti Maru (Te Iwi o Maruwharanui), Ngāti
Mutunga, Ngāti Ruanui, Ngāti Tama, Taranaki Iwi, and Te Atiawa.
In June 2020, Taranaki’s unemployment rate was at 4.3% with only small variations from one district to
another (compared to 4% nationally).
Households without access to a motor vehicle is highest in New Plymouth district (7.2% of
measurements to the
Chief Executive, upon request.
Advice Note:
It is acknowledged that there is potential for inaccurate flow records associated with
measuring the residual flow using water level data, given that a change in the rating curve
may result in there being less flow at the water level recorder than when the previous rating
was in use was established.
As such, in the event that the Taranaki Regional Council identifies (via its river gauging) that
there is
details of the performance and extent of compliance by the CCCWSL, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with CCCWSL’s approach to
demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
Table 13 Summary of performance for Consent 0597-3 56
Table 14 Summary of performance for Consent 4046-3 57
List of figures
Figure 1 Daily water abstraction by Ballance Agri-Nutrients, July
2015 – June 2016, m³ 16
Figure 2 Irrigation areas 26
Figure 3 Nitrogen application rates on spray irrigation areas, January
1992 to June 2016 28
Figure 4 Locations of groundwater monitoring bores 31
Figure 5 Total nitrogen concentrations in groundwater beneath spray
irrigation areas
established chlorophyll
a sampling protocols differ from those established more recently in the NOF, and results
cannot be directly translated to NOF bands.
Trend analysis was performed by applying a LOWESS fit (tension 0.4) to a time scatterplot
of the percentage cover of thick mats, and long filaments of periphyton for all sites and by
testing the significance of any trend using the Mann-Kendall test at the 5% level, followed by
Benjamini-Hochberg False Discovery Rate (FDR) analysis.
Freshwater ecological monitoring state of the environment report - Taranaki Regional Council.
been rated as
Good, as although the performance against most consent conditions with respect to the
administrative compliance was high, issues around testing of the integrity of the water take
pipeline and meeting the requirements of the Resource Management (Measurement and Reporting
of Water Takes) Regulations 2010 are yet to be resolved. Methanex have been open and
participative in their communication with regard to their progress on these issues.
For reference, in the 2015-2016 year, 71%
comprising 18% of the district’s population. Iwi and hapū of the Taranaki region
are Ngāti Maniapoto, Ngaa Rauru Kiitahi, Ngāruahine, Ngāti Maru (Te Iwi o Maruwharanui), Ngāti
Mutunga, Ngāti Ruanui, Ngāti Tama, Taranaki Iwi, and Te Atiawa.
In June 2020, Taranaki’s unemployment rate was at 4.3% with only small variations from one district to
another (compared to 4% nationally).
Households without access to a motor vehicle is highest in New Plymouth district (7.2% of
water take consent conditions to
determine your allowed rate of take. You need to know
your allowed rate of take to see if you are covered by
the regulations and the date by which you must comply.
page
There are around 20,000 consented water takes in New Zealand.
About three-quarters are for irrigation – most of the other
consents are for community water supplies and industry. About
one-third of all consented takes (and about one-third of the
total volume allocated by
.................................................................................................. 14
Table 5 Descriptions of expected liquefaction induced ground damage for liquefaction damage
ratings......................................................................................................................................... 18
Table 6 Liquefaction damage ratings assigned to liquefaction susceptibility classes at different
MM shaking intensities. .............................................................................................................. 18
Table