approach and that of consent holders
to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and
considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable
development of the region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by
the consent holder during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as
to the
(chlorophyll a 200
mg/m2) from 2025 onwards. The Council’s long-established chlorophyll a sampling protocol differs from
that established more recently for the NOF guideline and therefore results cannot be directly translated to
NOF bands. The Council is now also conducting a NOF-aligned periphyton monitoring programme.
Long-term trends in periphyton cover have been analysed using a combination of the Mann-Kendall
technique, a 5% significance level, and a Benjamini-Hochberg False Discovery Rate …
re-evaluate its approach
and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by MASL, this report
also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative
activity may have on the environment. In
addition, the applicant is required to identify the ways in which those effects can be avoided, remedied
or mitigated.
Schedule 4 can be viewed at www.trc.govt.nz/resource-consent-application-forms
AEE included? (please attach separate document) ☐ Yes
Where relevant the AEE must include, but not be limited to (tick all that apply): AEE Page Number Section
☐ The rate of discharge and hydrological effects
☐ Ecosystem health
the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance
abstraction and discharge data provided by NPDC.
The monitoring showed that overall the NPDC water schemes are well operated and maintained and appeared
to be having no adverse effects on the environment.
NPDC provided all the abstraction data required under consent conditions and the data showed that all
daily volume limits and instantaneous abstraction rates were complied with. Self-monitoring of the
Inglewood discharge showed minor non-compliances with suspended solids limits, however this
Gardens, also enjoyed greater patronage during the
year, with their gardens and facilities being continually refined
and enhanced.
The bottom line
The Council finished the 2017/2018 year with a surplus of
$962,000 (total comprehensive income). Total expenditure was
$26.6m. Overall it was a good result, noting that the general
rates increases have been at or below the rate of inflation for
the past few years (a 1% general rates increase in 2017/2018).
The Council's
ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good,
Long-term distribution ....................................................................................... 7
6.1.3 Long-term rate .................................................................................................. 8
6.2 VOLCANIC SIGNIFICANCE OF EARTHQUAKE DATA .............................................................. 11
6.3 SEISMIC NETWORK EFFECTIVENESS ................................................................................ 11
7.0 GROUND DEFORMATION MONITORING
.............................................................................................................. 7
6.1.1 Larger earthquakes .......................................................................................... 7
6.1.2 Long-term distribution ....................................................................................... 8
6.1.3 Long-term rate .................................................................................................. 9
6.2 Volcanic significance ................................................................................................... 11