page 70 Ngā āpitinga Appendices Appendix 1: Charging policies Resource Management Act charging policySchedule of charges pursuant to section 36 of the Resource Management Act 1991 SCHEDULE 1: SCALE OF CHARGES FOR STAFF TIME Rate for processing resource consents and responding to pollution incidents. Rate for all other Council work. Professional staff $111/hr $106/hr Professional/supervisory staff $141/hr $132/hr Team Leaders $173/hr $161/hr
are compelling cases for the Council to slightly alter the course originally charted in our 2015/2025 Long-Term Plan. This Plan includes what we’re proposing in these three specific areas, and how you can tell us what you think about them before we make final decisions. Financially, the development of changes is relatively minor. With all three proposals included in the 2017/2018 Annual Plan, general rates will go up 1% as opposed to the 0.5% rise
compelling cases for the Council to slightly alter the course originally charted in our 2015/2025 Long-Term Plan. This Plan includes what we’re proposing in these three specific areas, and how you can tell us what you think about them before we make final decisions. Financially, the development of changes is relatively minor. With all three proposals included in the 2017/2018 Annual Plan, general rates will go up 1% as opposed to the 0.5% rise forecast for
consultation process on these new proposals before committing to them in this Plan. Financially, the impact of these developments is relatively minor. With all three proposals included in this 2017/2018 Annual Plan, general rates will go up 1% as opposed to the 0.5% rise forecast for 2017/2018 in the 2015/2025 Long-Term Plan. The Council wishes to thank all submitters, on the draft of the Plan, for their contribution to the development of the final Plan.
access for fish to National Park. Very popular and highly valued angling river. High native fish diversity and presence of threatened species. Upper and middle reaches very highly rated for aesthetic and scenic values. Median flow of 3500l/s at Mangatete Bridge. Steep gradients in upper and mid reaches with significant water movement and many rapids. Water quantity and movement contributes significantly to wild and scenic character. 39% total riparian cover, upper reaches
through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement
Consents & Regulatory Committee agenda February 2021
almost exactly, what was outlined for 2016/2017 in the 2015/2025 Long-Term Plan. There are no new issues, plans or programmes or work. The Council views this Annual Plan as “business as planned”. This Plan sets out how we intend to maintain our status as one of the lowest-rating Councils in New Zealand while still maintaining a high standard of programmes and services. The 2016/2017 year will see an increase of 1% in the general rates take (as forecast for
assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in appendix 2. For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental performance and compliance for 88% of the consents monitored through the Taranaki tailored
management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. The rating categories are