are
compelling cases for the Council to slightly alter the
course originally charted in our 2015/2025 Long-Term
Plan.
This Plan includes what we’re proposing in these three
specific areas, and how you can tell us what you think
about them before we make final decisions.
Financially, the development of changes is relatively
minor. With all three proposals included in the
2017/2018 Annual Plan, general rates will go up 1% as
opposed to the 0.5% rise
compelling cases for the Council to slightly alter the
course originally charted in our 2015/2025 Long-Term
Plan.
This Plan includes what we’re proposing in these three
specific areas, and how you can tell us what you think
about them before we make final decisions.
Financially, the development of changes is relatively
minor. With all three proposals included in the
2017/2018 Annual Plan, general rates will go up 1% as
opposed to the 0.5% rise forecast for
consultation
process on these new proposals before committing to
them in this Plan.
Financially, the impact of these developments is
relatively minor. With all three proposals included in
this 2017/2018 Annual Plan, general rates will go up 1%
as opposed to the 0.5% rise forecast for 2017/2018 in
the 2015/2025 Long-Term Plan.
The Council wishes to thank all submitters, on the draft
of the Plan, for their contribution to the development
of the final Plan.
access for fish to
National Park.
Very popular and highly valued
angling river.
High native fish diversity and
presence of threatened species.
Upper and middle reaches
very highly rated for
aesthetic and scenic values.
Median flow of 3500l/s at Mangatete Bridge. Steep gradients in upper and
mid reaches with significant water movement and many rapids. Water
quantity and movement contributes significantly to wild and scenic character.
39% total riparian cover, upper reaches
rates notice)
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
2.5 Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to land title or rates notice)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
2.6 Name of closest river or stream to the works?
page
07/23- #650412 Page 4 of 8
rates notice)
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
2.5 Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to land title or rates notice)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
2.6 Name of closest river or stream to the works?
page
07/23- #650412 Page 4 of 8
almost
exactly, what was outlined for 2016/2017 in the
2015/2025 Long-Term Plan. There are no new issues,
plans or programmes or work. The Council views this
Annual Plan as “business as planned”.
This Plan sets out how we intend to maintain our status
as one of the lowest-rating Councils in New Zealand
while still maintaining a high standard of programmes
and services. The 2016/2017 year will see an increase of
1% in the general rates take (as forecast for
for comparison with
. ... ... guideline values. In other words, how many sheds could be discharging odour at
.^ \ SA
i . ^' 5
. ^/^!
page
16
maximum rate at any one time. Dr Brady and Ms Barclay consider that the number
of sheds discharging at the higher rate is best determined using statistical techniques
based on empirical data. The other experts do not agree that there are sufficient
data to allow reliable conclusions to be drawn.
[51] Mr Chilton provided a
various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both environmental
and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in Appendix II.
For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental
Upper and middle reaches
very highly rated for
aesthetic and scenic values.
Median flow of 3500l/s at Mangatete Bridge. Steep gradients in upper and
mid reaches with significant water movement and many rapids. Water
quantity and movement contributes significantly to wild and scenic character.
39% total riparian cover, upper reaches mostly indigenous, middle reaches
mixed vegetation, exotic trees and pasture, lower reaches barren or
introduced grasses and weeds.