of water take are provided in the
attached Assessment of Environmental Effects.
This application is being made concurrently with six other
applications relating to the continued operation and
maintenance of the Mangorei HEPS.
Is a structure on, under, or over a river bed required? Yes
If a structure on, under, or over a river bed is needed please attach sketch plan of the structure including dimensions in the
"Documents" step.
What is the maximum rate of taking proposed
2016/17
Actual
2015/16
Actual
2014/15
Actual
2013/14
General rates $10.94m $10.94m $7.95m $7.95m $7.95m $7.95m $7.61m $7.54m $7.46m $7.40m $7.29m
Percent change 37.6% 37.6% 0% 0% 0% 4.5% 1.0% 1.0% 0.9% 1.4% 1.5%
General rates to
income 25.9% 22.8% 15.7% 18.3% 18.3% 22.2% 28.5% 30.0% 30.0% 30.2% 29.9%
Rates per
$100,000 capital
value
$24.13 $24.13 $24.17 $25.80 $25.80 $14.17 $15.55 $15.99 $16.64 $16.71 $17.18
Total expenditure $41.2m $49.7m $41.2m $37.8m $37.8m $31.3m
ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories
(or multiple documents) in the
"Documents" step. If you upload a document containing your answers, please refer to the document name and the relevant
page number in the text box.
Give full details of the source of the discharge and any
treatment it will receive prior to discharge:
These details are provided in sections 3 and 5 of the attached
Assessment of Environmental Effects.
Liquids discharged to water
What is the proposed maximum rate of discharge?
Rate 1180.0
continually re-evaluate its approach
and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s
can result in substantial changes in sediment regimes.
Streams in pastureland generally have a greater sediment yield than those under forested areas
(Davis-Colley, 1997). National literature of erosion rates in New Zealand suggest erosion rates are
between 3 – 11 times higher in catchments under pasture than those under forest, and sediment
yields are 50 – 80 % higher in pastureland than forested catchments (Basher, 2013). The processes
operating on Mount Taranaki may be contrary to this,
Ordinary Council Meeting Agenda 5 April 2022
high level of environmental
performance and compliance for 878 (87%) of a total of 1007 consents monitored through the Taranaki
tailored monitoring programmes, while for another 96 (10%) of the consents a good level of environmental
performance and compliance was achieved. A further 27 (3%) of consents monitored required improvement
in their performance, while the remaining one (<1%) achieved a rating of poor.
In terms of overall environmental and compliance performance by the Company over
Table 3 CCCWSL backwash self-monitoring discharge sampling 6
Table 4 Summary of performance for Consent 1134-3.2 12
Table 5 Summary of performance for Consent 5454-2.0 13
Table 6 Summary of performance for Consent 6077-2 14
List of figures
Figure 1 CCCWSL’s water service area 3
Figure 2 CCCWSL abstraction rates for 2021-2022 7
Figure 3 CCCWSL residual flow compliance for 2021-2022 8
Figure 4 Location of biomonitoring sites in the Cold Stream in relation to the Cold
opposed to rates directly. Currently the Litter Act and the Waste Minimisation Act are
under review, that review will look at giving more power to Councils which then
provides an opportunity to reassess programme funding.
3.3 Ms J Dearden, New Plymouth District Council, provided an update on the Agrecovery
‘One stop shop events’ advised that there was regional funding to hold more events in
future however, an alternative provider would be involved due to unforeseen
circumstance