environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating
Coastal Plan submissions A-F
Under the NPS-FM, water use is
managed by setting environmental
flows and levels, taking into account
any changes that are likely to occur as
a result of climate change. Limits can
then be set on the rate and amount
of water taken, and where and when
that water can be abstracted.
Monitoring of water use ensures that
people comply with the relevant rules
and regulations.
The Council’s current Regional
Freshwater Plan requires that 66% of
the mean annual low flow (MALF) be
retained as
a way
that provides for other freshwater values, such as
ecosystem health.
Under the NPS-FM, water use is managed by
setting environmental flows and levels, taking
into account any changes that are likely to occur
as a result of climate change. Limits can then be
set on the rate and amount of water taken, and
where and when that water can be abstracted.
Monitoring of water use ensures that people
comply with the relevant rules and regulations.
The
who might use water for crop irrigation and for municipal water supply to
enable them to comply with any consent limits. It is also important for ensuring that water allocated for use
is done so in a way that provides for other freshwater values, such as ecosystem health.
Under the NPS-FM, water use is managed by setting environmental flows and levels, taking into account
any changes that are likely to occur as a result of climate change. Limits can then be set on the rate and
sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by NPDC, this report
also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative …
cannot be
proven).
page
3
1.1.5 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance
by STDC, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and
administrative performance during the period under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the
receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year.
undertaking successful enforcement
action.
Commentary/Highlights
Consent holders are assessed each year on their environmental performance and on consent compliance. The performance is
publicly reported. Overall ratings for consent holders in the 2018/2019 year were found to be 83% ‘high’ and 13% ‘good’.
Reporting of the 2017/2018 programmes was completed, with the final suite of annual reports presented to Council in April
2019. Ninety-seven annual reports together with four
assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
provision of information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take data)
sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year.