Your search for 'rates' returned 2332 results.

Quarterly Operational Report September 2019

undertaking successful enforcement action. Commentary/Highlights Consent holders are assessed each year on their environmental performance and on consent compliance. The performance is publicly reported. Overall ratings for consent holders in the 2018/2019 year were found to be 83% ‘high’ and 13% ‘good’. Reporting of the 2017/2018 programmes was completed, with the final suite of annual reports presented to Council in April 2019. Ninety-seven annual reports together with four

NES F Structures and reclamation info sheet

Placement: The culvert must be open-bottomed or its invert must be placed so that at least 25% of the culvert’s diameter is below the level of the bed. The bed substrate must be present over the full length of the culvert and stable at the flow rate at or below which the water flows for 80% of the time.  Geomorphic process: The culvert must provide for the continuity of movement of sediment and debris. Fresh Water Plan for Taranaki conditions  cross

Department of Conservation Code of conduct for Minimising Acoustic Disturbance to Marine Mammals from Seismic Survey Operations 2013

as those between 30 and 180 kHz. page 132013 Code of Conduct for Minimising Acoustic Disturbance to Marine Mammals 3.8.8 Acoustic source tests Seismic source tests will be subject to the relevant soft start procedures for each survey level, though the 20-minute minimum duration does not apply. Where possible, power should be built up gradually to the required test level at a rate not exceeding that of a normal soft start. Level 1 and 2 seismic source tests with a maximum

Petrochem Kowhai-D hydraulic fracturing 2017-2018

management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review.

Todd Energy Mangahewa-D hydraulic fracturing 2016-2019

closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities

Todd Energy McKee production station consent monitoring 2017-2018

environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating

Mangapouri Cemetery consent monitoring 2019-2020

sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by NPDC, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative …

Annual report 2015-2016

cannot be proven). page 3 1.1.5 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by STDC, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year.