assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
provision of information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take data)
development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative
2013/14
Actual
2012/13
Actual
2011/12
Actual
2010/11
Actual
2009/10
Actual
2008/09
General rates $7.61m $7.61m $7.54m $7.46m $7.40m $7.29m $7.18m $7.18m $6.85m $5.7m $5.5m
Percent change 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 0.9% 1.4% 1.5% 0% 4.82% 20.2% 3.3% 2.4%
General rates to
income
28.5% 28.7% 30.0% 30.0% 30.2% 29.9% 31.6% 36.2% 31.8% 35.5% 32.1%
Rates per $100,000
capital value
$15.55 $15.55 $15.99 $16.64 $16.71 $17.18 $19.47 $17.34 $17.25 $12.96 $14.77
Total
not walking all over them and
looking after the plants that grow on them.
Table 22 State of the Environment Report – Mean annual observed coastline change
(metres/year)
Location Rate Location Rate
Waitara East -1.37 Paritutu Beach -0.45
Waitara West -0.54 Herekawe West -0.29
New Plymouth Airport -0.60 Omata -0.43
Bell Block Beach -0.32 Waireka -0.25
Waiwhakaiho East -0.31 Oakura Beach (variable) -0.20
Waiwhakaiho West -0.67 Stony River Mouth +1.53
avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects
of potentially hazardous, noxious, dangerous or toxic contaminants by ensuring that
any such discharge does not occur at a volume, concentration or rate or in such a
manner that causes or is likely to cause a hazardous, noxious, dangerous or toxic
effect on human or animal health, significant ecosystems or structures.
"by ensuring any such discharge does not occur" is directive language establishing a
bottom line in terms of dangerous
from 42% to above 70%. Notwithstanding
that while NIWA confirms a definite reduction in E coli levels, the rate of compliance
with NPS-FM targets has not changed over the same period5 due at least in part to the
reality that peak concentrations of E. coli at peak flows are not reduced by such riparian
interventions. Taking the above into account, regional gains in swimmability of some
20-25% in relative terms, from a current 39% (as modelled) to about 50%, is considered
more
performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by WestSide, this report
also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with WestSide’s approach to
demonstrating consent compliance in site operations
year-end performance may not be achieved:
Consent processing and administration: The pre-hearing success rate may be impacted upon by the Mt Messenger
consent process.
The following performance measures are noted as being red. That is, performance to date has not achieved the target or the
performance for the rest of the year is unlikely to achieve the target:
Nil.
page
QUARTERLY OPERATIONAL REPORT – SEPTEMBER 2018 2
Introduction
The
be achieved:
Nil.
The following performance measures are noted as being red. That is, performance to date has not achieved the target or the
performance for the rest of the year is unlikely to achieve the target:
Investment management: The Council’s Investment Policy has a 6% target for interest returns. The Local Government Act 2002 requires
the Council to set a target. In the current interest rate environment, the Council is unlikely to reach this target
programmes that cover
multiple consent holders) in 2016/2017, together with additional programmes for hydrocarbon exploration and development activities.
Consent holders are assessed each year on their environmental performance and on consent compliance. Overall ratings for consent
holders in the 2016/2017 year were found to be 74% ‘high’ and 21% ‘good’. 2016/2017 programmes are being reported to the Council.
The dairy farm effluent system non-compliance rate in 2016/2017 was at a level