for servicing the liability, with the aim of avoiding the use of rate income.” The story now: The inherited debt was largely paid off by 1997, when the Council received its first cash dividend from the port. Dividends have since offset rates requirements, and the Council also operates a dividend equalisation fund, in which any dividends surplus to budget are kept for when dividends are below budget. Port Taranaki Ltd, meanwhile, reported its highest-ever
its approach and that of consent holders to resource management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the region’s resources. 1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and
configuration stocked at the operational peak stocking density (35 kg/m2) and with exhaust via horizontal vents; (c) stocking of Sheds 1 and 2 at the rate allowed under permitted activity Rule 51 of the Taranaki Regional Air Plan (total of 30,000 birds) with exhaust via horizontal vents; and page 2200818 | 6738310v1 page 2 (d) stocking of Sheds 1 and 2 at permitted activity rate (total of 30,000 birds) with exhaust via vertical 7m high chimney vents (as
(L). This type of assessment is similar to the guideline for assessing odour in the RAQP. The FIDOL factors are explained in greater detail below: • Frequency; relates to how often an individual is exposed to odour. Factors determining this include the frequency that the source releases odour (including its source type, characteristics and the rate of emission of the compound or compounds); prevailing meteorological conditions; and topography. • Intensity: is the perceived
Managing diffuse-source discharges to land and water in Taranaki - Taranaki Regional Council
rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take data) in accordance
categorised, 2 were rated ‘poor’, 1 was rated ‘improvement required’, 2 were rated ‘good’ and 14 ‘high’. During the year under review there were eight incidents associated with the Whareroa site (five incidents linked with milk spills requiring disposal of product via the marine outfall, two incidents involving stormwater pond non-compliances and one incident requiring the disposal of milk permeate to land). One Infringement Notice was issued during the 2012-2013 period relating to non- compliant
(NZTM) 3.4 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice) _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ 3.5 Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to land title or rates notice) _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 3.6 What is
performance Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance …
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site