rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s
approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely
provision of information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take data) in accordance
TDF is not operational during maintenance or breakdown;
the sludge volume exceeds the operational capacity of the TDF; and
the TDF is being upgraded.
8. The land proposed for the discharge in this application was approximately 4.2 ha. The
application states that it would therefore likely provide sufficient capacity for disposal
of 10,000 wet tonnes of sludge. However, recognising the maximum proposed
discharge rate of 2000 tonnes/ha, and taking account of buffer distances, NPDC
transport network, integrated across the whole transport
system, which enables Taranaki to thrive and to lead sustainably prosperous New Zealand.”.
Long-Term Plans
The Council’s Long-Term Plan (LTP) describes how the council is to deliver the outcomes agreed to
by the local community, the level of rates expected for the first three years of the LTP and other
information pertinent to the community. One aspect of a LTP is to set out public transport activities
and funding sources
Duration of consent
b) Imposition of limits on or relating to discharge or
ambient concentrations, or on or relating to
mass discharge rates
c) Best practicable option to prevent or minimise
any adverse effects on the environment
d) Location of any facilities or equipment
discharging to air in relation to surrounding land
uses
e) Visual effects, loss of amenity value of air,
chronic or acute human health effects, soiling or
damage to property, odour, annoyance and
at the date that the asset is derecognised. The depreciation
charge for each period is recognised through the Statement of Financial Performance.
The carrying value is depreiated on a straight-line basis over its useful life. The useful life and associated depreciation rate for
the IRIS software suite is 10 years and 10%.
Where software in this category is replaced, upgraded or determined by RSHL to be of no further operational benefit, a change in
value will be recognised through the
race and
lake water levels was generally good. With regard to the management and recording of flows within the
diversion race, performance has improved significantly compared to previous monitoring years, with no
significant loss of data. This is the second consecutive monitoring period to record no such occasions of lost
data since monitoring has focused on the continuity of the data record. There were only three occasions
where required flow rates were not complied with. The first related to
move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance and administrative compliance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder/s
during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and
administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment
move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
page
3
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental performance and administrative compliance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holder/s
during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and
administrative performance.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on
resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the
the non compliances identified related to the non-submission of injection data and
supporting information during the previous 2009 -2012 monitoring period. This non-
compliance resulted in the Company’s compliance rating being downgraded for 2009-2012
page
period. This non-compliance has therefore not been taken into account when assessing the
Company’s compliance rating for the period under review.
A second unauthorised incident was registered when the Council became