11 New Zealand Railways Corporation/KiwiRail Holdings Ltd (KiwiRail) 64
11.1 Process description 64
11.2 Water discharge permits 65
11.3 Results 65
11.3.1 Inspections 65
page
v
11.3.2 Chemical analysis 65
11.3.2.1 Results of discharge monitoring 65
11.3.2.2 Results of receiving environment monitoring 66
11.4 Investigations, interventions, and incidents 67
11.5 Discussion 67
11.5.1 Discussion of site performance 67
11.5.2 Environmental effects of …
Lot 1 DP 392547 Jomarc Limited Private
9 Section 6 Block VII Huiroa SD A R Hann Trustee Limited, John David Hann, Leonard
Gordon Hann
Private
10 Lot 3 DP 453998;
Lot 2 DP 453998;
Section 21 Block VII Huiroa SD
Andrea Elizabeth Bunn, GQ Trustees 2012 Limited, Lyall
Antony Bunn
Private
11 Part Lot 1 DP 5318;
Part Section 3S Ratapiko SETT;
Section 67 Block VI Huiroa SD;
Section 66 Block VI Huiroa SD;
Lot 2 DP 457321;
Lot 1 DP 16170
Ross Norman
trend direction
(ranging from 50% to 100%) is categorised based on the categories in Table 4.
page
7
Table 4 Confidence categorisation for trend direction results
Confidence Category Confidence in reported trend
direction
Very Likely Improving 90 – 100%
Likely Improving 67 – 90%
Indeterminate 50 – 67%
Likely Degrading 67 – 90%
Very Likely Degrading 90 – 100%
The trend methods implemented are limited to identifying a single direction (monotonic) …
Mary Gray
42 Pia Rockell
43 Jenny Murphy
44 Emma Parker
45 Julie Lumsden
46 Gillett Troy
47 Simon Raine
48 Keith Wills
49 Geoffrey Hobson
50 Robert Taylor
51 Rachel Eckersley
52 Charl van der Heever
53 Joanne Massey
54 Nigel Cliffe
55 Jean Mallinson
56 Dr Keith and Mrs Shirley Blayney
57 Marcon Wood
58 Carol Franklyn
59 Jocelyn Kruitbosch
60 Graham Cochrane
61 Wilfred Ivan Cudlipp
62 Gordon Sole
63 Michael Bonner
64 Ben Bonner
65 Laura Elizabeth
66 Alison Rumball
67 Peter
Waiwhakaiho Egmont Village 18 20.0 98 1899.0 109 80 Aug 1990
Manganui Everett Park 18 173.5 95 1561.5 103 76 Jan 1987
Oxi' Ponds Inglewood 20 190.0 85 1640.0 96 70 May 1999
TRC Stratford 17 187.0 99 1646.0 111 84 Jul 1998
Mangaehu Toko (Huinga) 17 137.5 95 1208.5 103 78 Jul 1998
Kotare Tongaporutu 17 175.0 81 1418.0 92 66 Jan 1998
Kaka Rd Okoki 16 190.5 94 1480.0 93 67 Aug 1990
Pohokura Saddle Pohokura 20 202.5 107 1409.5 98 71 Aug 1990
Stony Mangatete Rd 22 160.0 93 1575.5
summer surveys 56
4.11.4 Long-term trend analysis 56
4.11.5 MfE guidelines additional sampling 57
4.12 Ohawe Beach 59
4.12.1 SEM programme 59
4.12.2 Compliance with guidelines 60
4.12.3 Comparison with previous summer surveys 61
4.12.4 Long-term trend analysis 62
5. General summary 63
5.1 Regional overview 63
5.2 National context 65
5.3 Conclusion 66
6. Recommendations 67
Glossary of common terms and abbreviations 68
Bibliography and References
8 7 8
Zinc mg/kg 300 73 94 68 80 72 67
Barium* mg/kg 10,000 590 5,400 284 588 2,200 1,090
Chloride mg/kg 700 8 19 9 32 38 110
Conductivity mSm-1 290 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Sodium mg/kg 460 89 440 420 84 380 410
Soluble salts mg/kg 2,500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500
Sodium absorption ratio - 18 1.50 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.80
Table 3 Geary landfarm soil compliance results 2
Parameter Unit
Consent
Limit
Spreading areas sampled
G17 G18 G20 G23 G26 G27
- The Trustees $708
PKW Farms LP $1,417
Pungarehu Farmers Group Water Scheme $1,131
Rowan Paul Oldfield $842
SC & MJ O'Neill Family Trust $442
South Taranaki District Council $43,379
Stoney River Dairy Limited $175
Stratford District Council $10,440
Taranaki Greenhouses Limited $775
Taranaki Regional Council $2,132
Te Rua O te Moko 2B Ahuwhenua Trust $708
The Tom Lance Trust $1,361
Turangarere Trust $575
Zenith Farms Family Trust $864
page
67
EXPLANATION
The
comparison 67
Figure 43 Downstream ammoniacal nitrogen concentration changes in the Kaupokonui Stream from the
monthly stream surveys, with previous years for comparison 67
Figure 44 Downstream conductivity changes in the Kaupokonui Stream from the monthly stream
surveys, with previous years for comparison 68
Figure 45 Downstream nitrate-nitrite nitrogen concentration changes in the Kaupokonui Stream from
the monthly stream surveys, with previous years for comparison 68
Figure 46
Land Transport Plan for Taranaki: Mid-Term Review 2018/19-2020/21
67
page
FRODO-#2265199-v2-Request_to_vary_the_Taranaki_RLTP_-_Taranaki_SH_Speed_Management_Guide_Implementation Page 3 of 3
Timeframes for consideration of variation request
The following outlines the expected timeframes for processing this variation request. The
organisation requesting the variation is responsible for outlining the proposal to the RTAG and
RTC.
Consideration by