Your search for '53 cumming street' returned 1613 results.

Appendix G - January 2020 compost results

page R J Hill Laboratories Limited 28 Duke Street Frankton 3204 Private Bag 3205 Hamilton 3240 New Zealand 0508 HILL LAB (44 555 22) +64 7 858 2000 mail@hill-labs.co.nz www.hill-laboratories.com T T E W This Laboratory is accredited by International Accreditation New Zealand (IANZ), which represents New Zealand in the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC). Through the ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement (ILAC-MRA) this accreditation is internationally

11Furtherinformation AppendixH2

page R J Hill Laboratories Limited 28 Duke Street Frankton 3204 Private Bag 3205 Hamilton 3240 New Zealand 0508 HILL LAB (44 555 22) +64 7 858 2000 mail@hill-labs.co.nz www.hill-laboratories.com T T E W Certificate of Analysis Page 1 of 3 Client: Contact: Remediation (NZ) Limited C/- Brixton Organic Centre PO Box 8045 New Plymouth 4342 Remediation (NZ) Limited Lab No: Date Received: Date Reported: Quote No: Order No: Client Reference: Submitted By: 1963107 14-Apr-2018

Pest-off Hi-strength possum bait

page Brodifacoum 50ppm Revised March 2016 Page 1 of 4 ANIMAL CONTROL PRODUCTS LTD SAFETY DATA SHEET 1. CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION Product Name: PESTOFF HI-STRENGTH POSSUM BAIT Synonyms: Pestoff double strength. Supplier: Animal Control Products Ltd Street address: Physical address: 408 Heads Road, Whanganui 4501, New Zealand. Postal address: Postal

Executive, Audit & Risk agenda Dec 2020

(Taranaki Regional Council) 2,467 53 6 This week our science team started its summer water quality monitoring at Taranaki's most popular beaches, lakes and rivers - regularly testing up to 40 sites across the region � ♀฀🏄 (Taranaki Regional Council) 1,700 14 7 Four-year old Mia finally got to plant the 'Rosy Comet' over the weekend. A new variety of vireya that she won the honour of naming during our summer passport challenge competition. 1,046 102 Executive, Audit …

Summer 2015-2016

summers’ surveys 39 4.2.5.3 Benthic cyanobacteria 40 Patea River at the boat ramp, Patea 41 4.2.6 4.2.6.1 Comparison with guidelines 43 4.2.6.2 Comparison with previous summers’ surveys 44 Waingongoro River at Eltham camp 44 4.2.7 page ii 4.2.7.1 Comparison with guidelines 47 4.2.7.2 Comparison with previous summers’ surveys 48 4.2.7.3 Benthic cyanobacteria 49 Waingongoro River at Ohawe Beach 50 4.2.8 4.2.8.1 Comparison with guidelines 53 4.2.8.2 Comparison with

Fonterra Kapuni consent monitoring 2018-2019

2.1.2.1.8 Riparian planting 43 2.1.2.1.9 Disposal of solid wastes 47 2.1.3 Results of discharge monitoring 48 2.1.3.1 Physicochemical 48 2.1.3.1.1 Cooling waters’ quality 48 2.1.3.1.2 Stormwater quality 49 2.1.4 Receiving water (Kaupokonui Stream) quality 53 2.1.5 Groundwater quality 59 2.1.5.1 Farm 1 groundwater 62 2.1.5.2 Farm 2 groundwater 64 2.1.5.3 Farm 3 groundwater 70 2.1.5.4 General 75 2.1.6 Motumate Stream surface water quality 79 2.1.7

Review of minimum flows & water allocation in Taranaki

.............................................................................................................................. 53 9.5 Reliability of supply ............................................................................................................... 53 9.6 Flexibility ............................................................................................................................... 53 10 Stakeholders ............................................................................................................................. 54 11 References

Annual report 2012-2013

DH Lepper Piggery Annual consent monitoring report 2012-13 - Taranaki Regional Council

LTP consultation themes & outcomes

breakdown of what you told us and what we decided as a result: Delivering on NZ’s freshwater aspirations At what pace should the Council respond to the Government’s Essential Freshwater package and the extensive and expensive new requirements it brings? Should we move quickly to boost capacity to meet Government requirement and public expectations (the preferred option)? Or should we move gradually, doing only what is needed to meet requirements? 53 submitters expressed direct support