_________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
page
05/18 - #623858 Page 10 of 15
9 Assessment of Part 2 Matters and Policy
The proposal is consistent with Part 2 of the RMA (the focus of which is to promote
sustainable management of natural resources). The Regional Freshwater Plan for Taranaki
generally
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
page
05/18 - #623858 Page 11 of 16
9 Assessment of Part 2 Matters and Policy
The proposal is consistent with Part 2 of the RMA (the focus of which is to promote
sustainable management of natural resources). The Regional Freshwater Plan for Taranaki
generally supports
monitoring purposes (refer example
windrow monitoring sheet & plan Appendix 1).
1.2.4. Windrow monitoring and operational procedure
Temperature testing of the windrows begins four to nine days after they have been
formed. When the temperature reaches between 60-70 degrees Celsius the windrow
is turned from the outside to the middle with a digger (preferably from existing
ground level, however on some sites with room constraints and the size of finished
windrows they may need to be
Greenwaste Composting & Vermiculture
Water may need to be added at this stage. The completed windrow is then
numbered and is entered onto a chart for monitoring purposes (refer example
windrow monitoring sheet & plan Appendix 1).
1.2.4. Windrow monitoring and operational procedure
Temperature testing of the windrows begins four to nine days after they have been
formed. When the temperature reaches between 60-70 degrees Celsius the windrow
is turned from the outside to the middle
redevelopment work planned in
that area is completed. Solid lines indicate line lengths currently able to be monitored. Dashed lines
can be monitored when instruments are installed at Dawson Falls. The base map is from Google
Earth.
page
Confidential 2017
GNS Science Consultancy Report 2017/142 14
Figure 7.2A The displacement of the GNSS site PGKH at Kahui Hut on Mt Taranaki for 2014 to 2017.
Displacements in the north-south (dn), east-west (de), and up-down (du)
intention is to also install a site at Dawson Falls once redevelopment work
planned in that area is completed. Solid lines indicate line lengths currently able to be monitored.
Dashed lines can be monitored when instruments are installed at Dawson Falls. The base map is
from Google Earth.
page
Confidential 2016
GNS Science Consultancy Report 2016/139 13
Figure 7.2 The displacement of the GNSS site PGKH at Kahui Hut on Mt Taranaki. Displacements in the
north-south
of the western portion of the North Island of
New Zealand. No deformation of the volcano is apparent in the data collected so far.
page
Confidential 2015
GNS Science Consultancy Report 2015/132 13
Figure 6.5 Locations of GNSS sites on or near Mt Taranaki. Sites are labelled by their 4-letter site codes.
NPLY is New Plymouth, PGKH is Kahui Hut and PGNE is North Egmont. The intention is to also
install a site at Dawson Falls once redevelopment work planned in
responsible for processing data
recorded by the network from January 1994 until June 1997. These data were regularly
reported to Taranaki Regional Council (TRC), and data from the period January 1994 to
March 1995 were summarised in Cavill et al. (1997). In July 1997, GNS Science took over
responsibility for data analysis and annual reporting under contract to TRC.
In 2001, the GeoNet project started to improve the existing network for monitoring
earthquakes in New Zealand. In 2005, planning
1995 were summarised in Cavill et al. (1997). In July 1997, GNS Science took over
responsibility for data analysis and annual reporting under contract to TRC.
In 2001, the GeoNet project started to improve the existing network for monitoring
earthquakes in New Zealand. In 2005, planning began for upgrading seismographs in
Taranaki to an equivalent standard to that in other parts of New Zealand. With this upgrade
came two important changes. Firstly, the role of the network expanded from
data analysis and annual reporting under contract to TRC.
In 2001, the GeoNet project started to improve the existing network for monitoring
earthquakes in New Zealand. In 2005, planning began for upgrading seismographs in
Taranaki to an equivalent standard to that in other parts of New Zealand. With this upgrade
came two important changes. Firstly, the role of the network expanded from solely one of
monitoring Mt Taranaki to both monitoring Mt Taranaki and contributing to the New Zealand