promote sustainable management of natural
resources) and supported by the relevant Regional Plan.
The Regional Freshwater Plan for Taranaki generally supports taking of surface water for irrigation if at least 2/3 of habitat at
MALF is retained and particular regard is had for specific matters such as ecological and amenity values, existing and future
needs, and the relationship of Tangata with the water body.
Part 2 and policy assessment I adopt the RMA assessment above
Consultation
page
Taranaki Stadium Trust
Statement of Financial Performance
For the Three Years Ended 30 June 2024, 30 June 2025 and 30 June 2026
Budget Budget Budget
2024 2025 2026
$ $ $
Income
Taranaki Regional Council Grant 2,178,669 2,178,669 2,178,669
Crown Infrastructure Partners Funding 12,000,000 2,800,000 0
Rent 70,000 70,000 70,000
Interest received 0 0 0
Total income 14,248,669 5,048,669 2,248,669
Expenditure
Depreciation and amortisation expense 900,000 1,200,000 1,400,000
Major
page
Taranaki Stadium Trust
Statement of Financial Performance
For the Three Years Ended 30 June 2023, 30 June 2024 and 30 June 2025
Budget Budget Budget
2023 2024 2025
$ $ $
Income
Taranaki Regional Council Grant 2,178,669 2,178,669 2,178,669
Crown Infrastructure Partners Funding 10,000,000 3,594,347 0
Interest received 0 0 0
Total income 12,178,669 5,773,016 2,178,669
Expenditure
Depreciation and amortisation expense 500,000 1,000,000 1,400,000
Major maintenance 20,000 20,000
finely dissected.
Assessment methods
This assessment is informed by site visits and a review of existing information. The
potentially affected sites were visited on several occasions between November 2018
and January 2020. Existing information on terrestrial ecological values was obtained
from a range of sources, including the scientific literature, district and regional council
reports, and various online sources such as bird and plant databases. These are cited
evaluative exercise. In other words, genuine
consideration and application of relevant plan may leave little room for Part 2 to influence the outcome.
RMA Part 2 assessment I will upload an assessment of the activity under Part 2 as
outlined above.
Regional Freshwater Plan for Taranaki (RFWP)
The RFWP generally supports discharges to water or land if adverse effects such as those associated with reduced water quality
are avoided, remedied or mitigated. Subject to the National Policy
header embedded:image3.jpeg TRC logo cymk
_GoBack embedded:image1.jpeg C:\Users\Brenda\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Word\Cover Standing Orders 2022-25.jpg
Taranaki Regional Council
embedded:image2.jpeg TRC logo cymk
Standing Orders
Date of adoption: 8 November 2022 Doc# 3112365-v2
footer
Taranaki Regional Council – Standing Orders
title Preface/ Kupu whakapuaki
body_Text Standing
assessment of the activity under Part 2 as
outlined above.
Regional Freshwater Plan for Taranaki (RFWP)
The RFWP generally supports discharges to water or land if adverse effects such as those associated with reduced water quality
are avoided, remedied or mitigated. Subject to the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2020 these
requirements can be met by the methods detailed in this application.
RFWP assessment: I adopt the assessment against the RFWP above; or
https://maps.trc.govt.nz/LocalMapsViewer/?map=14083dae18734b83a3a7a0fc51b34283
page
Regional Freshwater Plan for Taranaki (RFWP)
The RFWP generally supports discharges to water or land if adverse effects such as those associated with reduced water quality
are avoided, remedied or mitigated. Subject to the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2020 these
requirements can be met by the methods detailed in this application.
RFWP assessment: I adopt the assessment against the RFWP above; or
National Policy Statement for Freshwater
application of relevant plan may leave little room for Part 2 to influence the outcome.
RMA Part 2 assessment I will upload an assessment of the activity under Part 2 as
outlined above.
Regional Freshwater Plan for Taranaki (RFWP)
The RFWP generally supports discharges to water or land if adverse effects such as those associated with reduced water quality
are avoided, remedied or mitigated. Subject to the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2020 these
requirements can be met
required.
RMA Part 2
Case law has determined that where the relevant plan provisions have clearly given effect to Part 2 of the RMA there may be no
need to undertake an assessment against Part 2 as it would not add anything to the evaluative exercise. In other words, genuine
consideration and application of relevant plan may leave little room for Part 2 to influence the outcome.
RMA Part 2 assessment I will upload an assessment of the activity under Part 2 as outlined
above.
Regional