a treetop canopy walk across a rain forested valley.
To also invest directly in the Kaitake Trail proper.
To complete outer tracks and a lookout at Pukeiti to complement the Taranaki Crossing.
To establish a family tramping hut within Pukeiti, as well as a new link to nearby commercial
accommodation.
WHAT IT MEANS FOR RATEPAYERS
The proposed direct contribution of $3.5 million to the Kaitake Trail is in the form of a grant. The Council will not
use rates to recover
striking features within the landscape which remain strong in the memory
Limited discordant elements disrupt the distinctive pattern of boulders along the river bed channel
Transient values Hangatahua (Stony) River catchment is exposed to some of the heaviest rain in New Zealand with rocks rolling down the river in accelerated river flows
frequently changing its course
At other times the river is recognised for having waters so clear that it appears that it isn’t there, however
Oil Services Ltd. Water samples were collected for
physicochemical analysis on selected inspections.
During the period under review, Port Taranaki Ltd obtained a ‘good’ rating for environmental and ‘high
rating’ for administrative performance and compliance with the resource consents.
Suspended solids in two samples marginally exceeded the consent limits during first flush. This was due to
heavy rain conditions at times when log loading onsite was in full operation. There were no
observations made on each of the
sampling occasions during the period under review are presented in Table 5.
Table 5 Observations at Lake Rotorangi monitoring sites on sampling occasions during 2020-2021
Date Lake level
(m asl) Weather
Wind Lake appearance
L2 L3 L2 L3
16 Oct 2020 76.78 Fine, rain 3
days prior
Light NE
breeze No wind
Turbid, brown-
green; surfaced
rippled
Turbid, green-
brown; surface
rippled
25 Feb 2021 76.65
Fine, dry
weather
preceding
page
Doc# 1888660-v1
Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of the
Taranaki Regional Council, held
Taranaki Regional Council Chambers, 47
Cloten Road, Stratford, on Tuesday 27
June 2017 at 10.30am.
Present Councillors D L Lean (Deputy Chairperson)
M J Cloke
M G Davey
C L Littlewood
M J McDonald
D H McIntyre
B K Raine
C S Williamson
Attending Messrs B G Chamberlain (Chief Executive)
A D McLay
have included better ease of stock
management. “Everything’s obviously 100% fenced now, so
there’s no stock wandering around, being places they shouldn’t
be, and aesthetically … it’s a lot nicer to look at now, and it’s got
to be better for the health of the stream,” he says.
“Certainly with the winter rains when the erosion comes through
– the big floods – the stabilisation of the creek-banks is way
better than it used to be. There’s not the erosion once it’s been
of the RMA stipulates that no person may take, use, dam or divert any water, unless the activity is
expressly allowed for by a resource consent or a rule in a regional plan, or it falls within some particular
categories set out in Section 14. Permits authorising the abstraction of water are issued by the Council
under Section 87(d) of the RMA.
Water discharge permits
Section 15(1)(a) of the RMA stipulates that no person may discharge any contaminant into water, unless the
activity is
Executive Audit and Risk Agenda October 2023 web v
Executive Audit and Risk Agenda October 2023
Executive Audit and Risk Agenda October 2023