was potentially leaking, staff advised that this would be investigated in summer.
Ngatoro G: the ring drain had been redefined and metal placed alongside it to help filter sediment.
Kaimiro Production Station and Ngatoro-A: Heavy, persistent rain and strong winds had proceeded the
inspection and it was noted that the stormwater system on both sites was working well. All stormwater was
being collected and directed for treatment prior to discharge from the site. The sites were tidy and
three leachate 23
Table 3 Results of analysis of under liner drainage 23
Table 4 Chemical analysis of the Manganaha Stream 24
Table 5 Chemical analysis of the Puremu Stream, sampled on 7 September 2011 25
Table 6 Chemical analysis of the Puremu Stream, sampled on 16 March 2012 26
Table 7 Results of rain event monitoring samples taken on 16 May 2012 28
Table 8 Results of rain event monitoring samples taken on 21 June 2012 29
Table 9 Chemical analysis of Colson Rd
Operations and Regulatory Committee agenda September 2025
Policy and Planning Committee Agenda Sept 2025
SDC Stratford WWTP Annual Report 2020-2021
Company
communicated that two different delivery systems were used during the 2023/24 monitoring year:
1. Dribble bar – main method of effluent application, depths applied (~3mm)
page
12
2. ‘Weta’ travelling rain gun – used to apply effluent to the Sand Dune block at 8-10mm depths during
7 months of the year.
Type of crops grown
Two crops were grown under the cut and carry system in 2023/24. Maize Silage paddocks (37.2ha) which
were cultivated in October and
operating
procedure. Notifications to Council were expected throughout the entire process. All resource consent
conditions were compliant at the time of inspection.
11 May 2021
A site inspection was carried out in overcast weather with light wind conditions. Heavy rain had been noted
in days prior to the visit, and this had resulted in some ponding within the bunded areas, however there
were no visible hydrocarbons present. All major works to re-line the bunds had been completed, with only
The cleanfill was inspected during fine weather. It had rained in the days preceding. There were no dust or
odour issues and the inspecting officer noted that the site appeared to be tidy. The majority of the
consented cleanfill area appeared to have been reinstated into paddock or was used for storage. Some
material had been recently deposited at the cleanfill, but a visual inspection confirmed that there was no
prohibited material. The material had originated from the site itself. A
14 of the Resource Management Act stipulates that no person may take, use,
dam or divert any water, unless the activity is expressly allowed for by a resource
consent or a rule in a regional plan, or it falls within some particular categories set
out in Section 14.
Approximate
site
boundary
Unnamed tributary
NNNN
page
7
As Taranaki Ventures Limited was unable to estimate the rate or volume of the take,
and as such, might exceed the limits of the
elevated soil
moistures in the range of 44 and 45 %. Conversely, prior to January 8th 2015, Uruti received only 1
mm of rain in the previous eight days, with soil moistures at 32 %, this would have resulted in
minimal outflow ‘gaining’ from the Haehanga Stream to the groundwater table.
page
14745-1
Commercial in confidence
6 6/2015
Table 2.4:Stream and Groundwater Elevations (msl)
Date Bore Bore elevation Stream Elevation GW elevation Groundwater