Taranaki sites. 69 Table 41 Comparison of 2013-2014 water quality with previous long-term (1995-2013) data (using median values) for each SEM site 76 page iv List of figures Figure 1 Freshwater physicochemical SEM sampling sites 5 Figure 2 Freshwater physicochemical SEM sampling sites aerial map 6 Figure 3 Flow record for the Mangaoraka Stream at Corbett Road 14 Figure 4 Flow record for the Waiwhakaiho River at SH3 Egmont Village 20 Figure
Fonterra Kapuni consent monitoring report - Taranaki Regional Council.
Todd Energy deep well injection rescource consent monitoring report 2017-2018
percentage of total days monitored. Data has been split into pre-400 L/s residual flow (1992-2002) and post 400 L/s residual flow (2002-2019), previous period (2019-20), and current year (2020-21) 20 Figure 9 Manganui River water temperature differences between sites upstream and downstream of the Motukawa HEP weir compared with the flow in the Manganui River at Everett Park from 8 November to 8 December 2018 21 Figure 10 Map showing sampled sites with current survey results 22 Figure 11
dairy farming area. Relatively minor earthworks were required to construct the site. The land had not been reinstated at page the time of the last inspection on 13 June 2013 as the well was still currently producing, and the site is still in use. 2.4 Contingency plan TAG Oil (NZ) Limited has provided a general contingency plan, as required by Condition 4 of recourse consent 7595-1 with site specific maps which cover all onshore sites that they operate. The
percentage of total days monitored. Data has been split into pre-400 L/s residual flow (1992-2002) and post 400 L/s residual flow (2002-2019), previous period (2019-20), and current year (2020-21) 20 Figure 9 Manganui River water temperature differences between sites upstream and downstream of the Motukawa HEP weir compared with the flow in the Manganui River at Everett Park from 8 November to 8 December 2018 21 Figure 10 Map showing sampled sites with current survey results 22 Figure 11
incident, the Company took immediate action to recover the oil such that there was no lasting environmental effects. Local iwi visited the site and approved the remedial measures. The Council brought an enforcement action against the Company, which pleaded guilty at the earliest opportunity to the charge. The Company was fined $20,000. The Court noted that the Company was prompt and responsible in its clean- up attempt and that it co-operated fully with the Council in its investigation and
recorded to date at Raupuha Road 35 Figure 17 Kahouri Stream Sites sampled for macroinvertebrates, in relation to the Contact Energy site 37 page v Figure 18 Map showing sampled sites with current taxa richness, MCI, and SQMCI values 39 Figure 19 Taxa richness and MCI scores recorded to date at site KHI000457 u/s of stormwater discharge 40 Figure 20 Taxa richness and MCI scores recorded to date at site KHI000480 below the stormwater discharge 40 page
monitoring site details 8 Table 4 Results of groundwater sampling carried out in relation to the Kowhai-A1R fracturing event 11 Table 5 Results of hydraulic fracturing fluid sampling 13 Table 6 Results of hydraulic fracturing return fluid sampling 13 Table 7 Summary of performance for consent 10356-1 16 List of figures Figure 1 Location map 5 page 1 1 Introduction 1.1 Compliance monitoring programme reports and the Resource Management Act
culvert at Mokau Rd, Uruti 50 Table 23 Summary of performance for Consent 6211-1 – stream realignment at Mokau Rd, Uruti 50 Table 24 Summary of performance for Consent 6212-1 - establishment of culvert at Mokau Rd, Uruti 51 List of figures Figure 1 Regional map showing locations of Remediation NZ’s Taranaki sites 3 Figure 2 RNZ site, Mokau Road, Uruti 5 Figure 3 Graph showing rise in irrigation fluid hydrocarbons 17 Figure 4 Graph showing rise in irrigation fluid