site activity .................................................................................................................... 7
3.1 Site map .................................................................................................................................................... 7
3.2 Description of the site activity ................................................................................................................ 8
3.3 Composting operation
interventions summary table 16
Table 4 Individual performance for all irrigation consent holders 18
List of figures
Figure 1 Percentage of water irrigation allocation per activity in the Taranaki region 3
Figure 2 Source of water for irrigation in Taranaki during the 2021-2022 period 3
Figure 3 Total consented water abstractions – distributed by activity 2021-2022 3
Figure 4 Pasture irrigation zones and locations of consented irrigation in Taranaki 4
Figure 5 Distribution map
usefulness for monitoring purposes is studied as at
the moment they are uncapped and opened to the surface. It is possible that the water
samples from the wells encountered may be representative of different water-yielding
zones within the same aquifer; however, the data that could be obtained from them could
be used as up-gradient baseline conditions.
Unfortunately there is not enough topographical information available to determine
groundwater flow-lines and potentiometric groundwater maps
substance in, on
or under the foreshore or
seabed for other purposes
C3.7 • Deposit is in volumes of more than 50 000 cubic metres at a site in
any 12 month period, other than as provided for by rule C3.8.
Discretionary 1.1(d), 2.1, 2.3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 6.6,
7.4, 8.1, 9.10, 11.1, 11.2, 13.1,
14.1, 14.2, 14.3
C3.8 • Deposit is in volumes of more than 50 000 cubic metres in the area
marked `Spoil Disposal Area' on Map 7 of this plan, in any 12 month
period.
Discretionary 1.1(d),
Investigation of the
items in this inventory may mean more archaeological sites are considered in future district
plan reviews.
The greatest number of archaeological sites identified is in South Taranaki. These 976 sites are shown
individually on STDC district planning maps but no specific information about the sites is included in
the South Taranaki District Plan.
The majority of archaeological
sites in Taranaki are on private
land and the condition of sites
varies. A number of
located around the edge of Beatrix Bay. Backbones (surface structures) on
the 37 marine farms span approximately 8.5 km (33%) of total shoreline
length at sea level (but more under water). Approximately 85% of the surface
area (2,000 ha) of Beatrix Bay is not occupied by mussel farms.
[10] At the hearing, a map was produced showing Beatrix Bay and
the King Shag foraging in detail. It illustrates the necklace arrangement of
the granted marine farms, together with the dates of the grant of those
C D Boyd Drilling Waste and Stockpiling Land & Landspreading Annual Report 2021-2022
Table 26 Summary of performance for Taranaki Trucking Company
Limited’s cleanfill consent 5561-1 69
Table 27 Summary of performance for Taranaki Trucking Company
Limited’s culvert consent 6280-1 70
List of figures
Figure 1 Regional map showing the locations of the cleanfills
monitored under this programme during the year under
review 5
Figure 2 AA Contracting Limited’s cleanfill and sampling sites at
Henwood Road, New Plymouth 11
Figure 3 A & A George Family
15
Table 7 Evaluation of environmental performance over time 16
List of figures
Figure 1 Aerial location map of sampling sites in relation to Inglewood WWTP 13
List of photos
Photo 1 Inglewood WWTP 4
Photo 2 The Inglewood WWTP main pond 8
Photo 3 Dissolved oxygen monitoring 9
page
1
1 Introduction
1.1 Compliance monitoring programme reports and the Resource
Management Act 1991
1.1.1 Introduction
This report is for the period July
for consent holder over time 21
List of figures
Figure 1 Site location and regional inset 5
Figure 2 Company provided site map with application areas 10
List of photos
Photo 1 North-west projection F9 towards F10 November 2015 12
Photo 2 South-east projection across F10 towards F9 23 May 2016 12
Photo 3 South-east projection F10 towards F9 February 2018 13
Photo 4 North-west projection over former storage cell area Febraury 2018 13
Photo 5 South-east