consent 6280-1 75
List of figures
Figure 1 Regional map showing the locations of the cleanfills monitored under this programme during
the year under review 5
Figure 2 AA Contracting Ltd cleanfill and sampling sites at Henwood Road, New Plymouth 11
Figure 3 A & A George Family Trust cleanfill at Dudley Road, Inglewood 16
Figure 4 AE Riddick's cleanfill and sampling site at Carrington Road, New Plymouth 20
Figure 5 BJ & LB Bishop's cleanfill sand sampling sites at Ahu Ahu,
conditions the consent holder must supply the Council with an
annual report to satisfy the following condition.
‘The consent holder shall keep records of the following:
a) Wastes from each individual well
b) Composition of wastes
c) Stockpiling area
d) Volumes of material stockpiled
e) Landfarming areas, including maps
f) Volumes and weights of wastes landfarmed
g) Dated of commencement and completion of stockpiling and landfarming events
h) Treatments applied
page
13
rivers, lakes or the coast. From the Stratford District, 74% of
respondents had visited one of these sites in the last year. Figure 2 represents the most
popular coastal, river or lake destinations for residents from the New Plymouth,
Stratford and South Taranaki Districts. The top ten most frequently visited sites for
residents from each district have been represented on these maps with dots
representing the percentage of respondents who listed that specific location. Some
respondents listed
Table 12 Results of Pukengahu closed landfill leachate sampling (RTP001001) 24
Table 13 Unnamed tributary of the Waihapa Stream downstream of the Pukengahu closed landfill
(WHP000187) 24
Table 14 Summary of performance for Consent 3891-3 (Pukengahu closed landfill) 25
Table 15 Evaluation of environmental performance over time - Pukengahu landfill 25
List of figures
Figure 1 Regional map showing SDC landfill sites 4
Figure 2 Stratford landfill (shaded in yellow) and
page
Trustpower – Mangorei HEPS
Terrestrial Ecology Assessment 7
Ryder Environmental Ltd
Figure 1. Aerial map showing location of structures and surface waters associated with the
Mangorei HEPS.
page
Trustpower – Mangorei HEPS
Terrestrial Ecology Assessment 8
Ryder Environmental Ltd
Ecological context
The HEPS and the above sites are located entirely within the Egmont Ecological
District in the Egmont Ecological Region (McEwen
TRC Annual Report 2017/2018 - community outcomes
List of figures
Figure 1 Sampling sites in the Kurapete Stream in relation to Inglewood
oxidation ponds 15
Figure 2 Aerial location map 15
Figure 3 Riparian plans prepared in the Kurapete Stream catchment to June
2015 20
page
1
1. Introduction
1.1 Compliance monitoring programme reports and the Resource
Management Act 1991
1.1.1 Introduction
This report is the Annual Report for the period July 2014 to June 2015 by the
Taranaki Regional
OMV Pohokura Production Station resource consent monitoring report 2019-2020
to provide a technology report on two
occasions, while Condition 20 requires an annual report. Condition 21 states that the
consent holder must maintain a contingency plan for the site.
Conditions 22 and 23 require the consent holder to meet with Council, iwi and
interested parties regarding the operation and monitoring of the consent.
Condition 24 is a review provision.
NPDC holds discharge permit 2982-4 to cover the discharge of up to 60 m3/day of
leachate from a sludge
to
stabilise the riverbank in this area.
page
Figure 2: Catchment Map
page
3. Future channel management
3.1. Scheme works area
Figure 7 shows the extents of the Schemes Rivers which are included in the works area. Close
examination of 2002 and 2016 aerial photographs however show that most of the clearing works on the
Waitotara River occurred in the river between the Lime Works Bridge and the Moumahaki confluence
and in the Moumahaki