A Study into the use of prosecutions under the Resource Management Act
A Study into the Use of Prosecutions under the Resource Management Act (Ministry for the Environment, 2013).
A Study into the Use of Prosecutions under the Resource Management Act (Ministry for the Environment, 2013).
Cemetery location map 4 Figure 2 Burial Plan for first five years of operation 9 Figure 3 Groundwater elevations 2020-2021 in comparison to rainfall 24 Figure 4 Groundwater levels GND2623, GND2625 and GND2624 compared to minimum required water table depths by burial type 25 Figure 5 Groundwater levels GND2484 and GND3032 compared to minimum required water table depths by burial type 26 Figure 6 Type of internment planned for Area-A and Area-B 28 page 1
page A P P E N D IC E S A P P E N D IX I X Appendix IX Maps of defined urban catchments page A P P E N D IC E S A P P E N D IX I X page 2 8 5 APPENDICES APPENDIX IX Figure 1: Eltham Defined urban catchment. page
tributary. The underlying landform is of LUC class 4s1, with Uia sandy loam soils. The site is located in the Egmont Ecological district, and the ecosystem type for this area has been mapped as MF8-2, Rimu, rata, kāmahi forest (Singers 2016), less reduced or intact, with 68% remaining (Leathwick, 2017). The structure of the vegetation at the site, as surveyed in the field, is dominated by a canopy of established regenerating kamahi, with tawa, rimu, miro and kahikatea becoming apparent in the
page ii List of tables Table 1 Summary of performance for Consent 6088-3 to discharge green waste onto land for stabilisation purposes 11 List of figures Figure 1 Regional map showing location of the Patea green waste site 4 Figure 2 Aerial view of the Patea Beach green waste disposal area 5 page 1 1. Introduction 1.1 Compliance monitoring programme reports and the Resource Management Act 1991 1.1.1
Key Native Ecosystem. In relation to each site, a sheet has been compiled summarising information on its location, land tenure, and physical and ecological features. For each site, the ecological values of regional significance, threats to those values, formal protection status and other protection (if any) are also identified. A map for each site is also provided. Status and availability The Inventory represents the data and information available at this time from published and
Bibliography and references 14 Appendix I Resource consent held by Cudby Contracting Limited Quarry 1 page ii List of tables Table 1 Summary of performance for Consent 7845-1 for discharge of stormwater into land from quarry activities 9 List of figures Figure 1 Aerial map showing Cudby Contracting Limited’s quarry site 4 page 1 1. Introduction 1.1 Compliance monitoring programme reports and
RTP001013 (lake adjacent cleanfill) 6 November 2012 (and summary of previous analyses) 8 Table 2 Summary of performance for consent 5606-1 to discharge cleanfill material onto and into land for quarry reinstatement purposes 10 List of figures Figure 1 Regional map showing the location of cleanfill/composting site 3 Figure 2 Aerial view of the Manutahi Rd compost and cleanfill site 4 List of photos Photo 1 Reinstated compost stormwater pond 7 Photo 2
land 9 List of figures Figure 1 Regional map showing the location of the site 4 Figure 2 Aerial image of the property 5 page 1 1. Introduction 1.1 Compliance monitoring programme reports and the Resource Management Act 1991 1.1.1 Introduction This report is the Annual Report for the period July 2013-June 2014 by the Taranaki Regional Council (the Council) on the monitoring programme associated with the resource consent held by
Map - Key Native Ecosystems – private and publicly managed. WHAT MAKES KEY NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT? Key Native Ecosystems are regionally significant because they are: home to threatened or regionally distinctive indigenous plant and animal species, or representative of originally rare ecosystems and indigenous vegetation now much reduced from its original extent (<10 or 20%), and/or connect or buffer other sites of value, or provide seasonal or