boiler & pipework—4 weeks
Baptist Church, Papakura, Crocidolite to Ceiling—4 weeks
CEPI, plant room 1 week
Thames school, Amosite boiler & pipework—3 weeks
2000—Consulting & Management for Opus Consultants
Hamilton Boys High, Amosite boiler & pipework—2 months
Whakatane High School, Amosite pipework—3 weeks
Thames Hospital, Amosite Debris cleanup—3 weeks
Coromandel Police station, Amosite pipework—1 week
Nga Iwi Primary school, Mangere, Amosite Pipework—3 weeks
Thames High School,
Stratford district (6.6% of households). Households without
access to a motor vehicle are generally slightly higher among iwi.
Iwi
There are eight recognised iwi whose ‘rohe’ or tribal area falls either
wholly or partially within the Taranaki region. The rohe of Ngati Ruanui,
Nga Ruahine, Taranaki, Te Atiawa and Ngati Mutunga are located
completely within the region. The rohe of Ngati Tama overlaps the
Waikato region to the north, and those of Ngati Maru and Nga Rauru
overlap the
objectives and limits in water
policy. I have provided evidence in these topic areas before the Environment Court,
and in Board of Inquiry and council hearings processes across the country.
page
4
5. I have provided ecological, water quality and freshwater policy advice to Nelson City
Council, Northland Regional Council, Horizons Regional Council, Ngāti Kahungunu
Iwi Incorporated, Ngāti Pāhauwera Development Trust, Te Rōpū Taiao o Ngāti
Whakatere, Te Taiwhenua o
Fonterra Whareroa Annual Report 2023-2024
mandate of the District Councils, so has not been included.
LIMITATIONS
The scoping study has been prepared as a desk-top study, and has not involved field work or site visits to record
new sites or assess present condition of previously recorded sites. Additionally, iwi have not been involved in
the preparation of this report.
While this report discusses both Māori and non-Māori site types it does not include wāhi tapu or consider the
significance of sites to Māori. It is
mandate of the District Councils, so has not been included.
LIMITATIONS
The scoping study has been prepared as a desk-top study, and has not involved field work or site visits to record
new sites or assess present condition of previously recorded sites. Additionally, iwi have not been involved in
the preparation of this report.
While this report discusses both Māori and non-Māori site types it does not include wāhi tapu or consider the
significance of sites to Māori. It is
restricted coastal activity. The application was
publicly notified on 28 October 2006. The submission period closed on 24 November
2006.
8. An advertisement was placed in the Taranaki Daily News, and a sign affixed at the site.
The following parties were also individually notified:
• Department of Conservation
• Minister of Conservation
• Maritime New Zealand
• Ministry of Fisheries
• New Zealand Historic Places Trust
page
• All Iwi in the Taranaki Region,
returning the application.
All collection costs incurred in the recovery of a debt will be added to the invoice amount due. Overdue
invoices will incur an interest charge of 12% per annum.
Details of Council’s charging policy are in its 2015/2025 Long-Term Plan.
(www.trc.govt.nz/council/plans-and-reports/strategy-policy-and-plans)
In accordance with statutory requirements a copy of this application may be sent to iwi for their
information.
page
06/22 - #623858 Page 19
the coastline from
Titoko ridge/Whakarewa Pā in the north to Waiau in the south. Ngāti Mutunga iwi and
whānau have gathered and continue to gather food according to the values and tikanga
of Ngāti Mutunga.
There remain important kaitiaki links to the pātiki, kōura and tāmure breeding grounds,
as well as other fish resources.
Another one of the Kaitiaki responsibilities that Ngāti Mutunga traditionally fulfilled and
has continued to the present day is to protect the
contact consents Administration Staff at consents@itrc. aovt. nz to determine if you are
required to seek comment from any Iwi Group under the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana)
Act 2011 before lodging the application.
3.2 Name and address of owner or occupier at the discharge site (if different from 2. 1 and 2.2)
Written approval of landowner(s) attached (See section 9) Yes 1-1 No 1-1
3.3 Location of activity (Including: Street/road name, number, and locality)
/^f-6Q /^okoi^ ^a^