activity had resulted in any adverse effects on stream health. The biomonitoring of surface water bodies was only introduced as a standard component of hydraulic fracturing page monitoring programmes in 2013, and therefore surveys were only carried out in relation to the fracturing of the Mangahewa-16 well. The monitoring carried out by the Council indicates that the hydraulic fracturing activities undertaken by Todd had no significant adverse effects on local groundwater or
direction. Disruption of access Access to the surf is important – to ensure all can use and enjoy the breaks. Factors to consider include entry/exit locations for pedestrians and vehicular access to the coast. What are we protecting surf breaks from? The following types of activities or developments have the potential to affect surf breaks. New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement. Any new activities or developments at these breaks will‘nationally significant’ not be allowed to have any
Particles found in the air we breathe vary greatly in size. The greatest health hazard from particles comes from the smallest ones – less than 10 microns (10 µm or 10 micrometres) across – because we easily inhale these small particles into our lungs. These particles are referred to as PM10 (referring to their size) or as inhalable particulate (referring to their potential effect). PM10 come from sources such as burning coal, oil, wood, and petrol and diesel in domestic fires, transportation and
inshore and offshore spoil disposal areas in the Tasman Sea. During the monitoring period, Port Taranaki Limited demonstrated an overall high level of environmental performance. The Council’s monitoring programme for the period under review included two intertidal surveys at four sites, and two kaimoana surveys at five sites. The results of intertidal surveys did not indicate that the disposal of dredged material was having a significant impact on the abundance or diversity of intertidal
Plan. Submission No. 4 Federated Farmers Taranaki Councillor D H McIntyre declared an interest in Submission No. 4 (Federated Farmers Taranaki) and took no part in the discussions or deliberations. Resolved THAT the Taranaki Regional Council 1. thanks the submitter for their submission 2. makes no change to 2017/2018 Annual Plan. Submission No. 5 Pukeiti Rhododendron Trust The submitter’s comments in support of their submission were received and noted.
copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. Whilst NIWA has used all reasonable endeavours to ensure that the information contained in this document is accurate, NIWA does not give any express or implied warranty as to the completeness of the information contained herein, or that it will be suitable for any purpose(s) other than those specifically contemplated during the Project or agreed by NIWA and the Client. Prepared by: Elizabeth Graham
_____________________________ Mobile ___________________________________ Name and address for service of documents [if different from above] ____________________________________________________________________________________ Consent number(s) or Dairy number Consent type Consent number(s) or Dairy number Consent type Reason for surrender(s) ________________________________________________________________
OR PLANS AND THE PROCESSING OF RESOURCE CONSENTS Request for preparation or change to a plan/policy statement $50,000 For non-notified farm dairy discharge consent $680 For non-notified consent other $1,020 For notified consents (limited and public) $6,800 Renewal, change or review of consent: Non-notified $680 Notified (limited and public) $6,800 Extension of a consent lapse date $448 Certificate of compliance $561 Approvals under Resource
significant adverse effects on local groundwater or surface water resources. There were no unauthorised incidents recording non-compliance in respect of the resource consent held by Petrochem in relation to these activities or provisions in regional plans, during the period under review. Petrochem demonstrated a high level of environmental and administrative performance and compliance with the resource consents over the reporting period. For reference, in the 2017-2018 year, consent holders
Nevertheless, neither New Plymouth District Council nor NIWA accept any liability, whether direct, indirect or consequential, arising out of the provision of information in this report. All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form without the permission of New Plymouth District Council (the client). Such permission is to be given only in accordance with the terms of the client's contract with NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage