dumping at the Ahititi site (primarily motorhome waste) must be eliminated
— the worm farm facility cannot accept or process human waste and associated
disinfectants.
Alternatively, the effluent will be transported to the New Plymouth WWTP for
disposal. There are significant expenses associated with this option such as the
construction of a weeping wall facility, the ongoing costs of transporting the
effluent to the WWTP and the disposal of solids (likely to Colson Road Landfill).
For the
occasions.
Monitoring of the Herekawe catchment consisted of eight inspections and discharge
sampling on three or four occasions for most sites. The Herekawe Stream itself was sampled
on seven occasions and four biomonitoring surveys were conducted.
Site inspections for both catchments consistently revealed no areas of concern. Sites were
found to be well maintained, bunded areas secure and stormwater treatment systems
operating effectively. Macroinvertebrate community index (MCI) values from
activity had resulted in any adverse effects on stream health. The biomonitoring
of surface water bodies was only introduced as a standard component of hydraulic fracturing
page
monitoring programmes in 2013, and therefore surveys were only carried out in relation to the
fracturing of the Mangahewa-16 well.
The monitoring carried out by the Council indicates that the hydraulic fracturing activities
undertaken by Todd had no significant adverse effects on local groundwater or
inshore and offshore spoil disposal areas in the
Tasman Sea.
During the monitoring period, Port Taranaki Limited demonstrated an overall high level
of environmental performance.
The Council’s monitoring programme for the period under review included two intertidal
surveys at four sites, and two kaimoana surveys at five sites.
The results of intertidal surveys did not indicate that the disposal of dredged material was
having a significant impact on the abundance or diversity of intertidal
direction.
Disruption of access
Access to the surf is important – to ensure all can use and
enjoy the breaks. Factors to consider include entry/exit
locations for pedestrians and vehicular access to the coast.
What are we protecting surf breaks from?
The following types of activities or developments have the potential to affect surf breaks.
New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement. Any new activities or
developments at these breaks will‘nationally significant’
not be allowed to have any
Particles found in the air we breathe vary greatly in size. The greatest health hazard from
particles comes from the smallest ones – less than 10 microns (10 µm or 10 micrometres)
across – because we easily inhale these small particles into our lungs. These particles are
referred to as PM10 (referring to their size) or as inhalable particulate (referring to their
potential effect). PM10 come from sources such as burning coal, oil, wood, and petrol and
diesel in domestic fires, transportation and
Littlewood/Joyce
page
7. Public Excluded
In accordance with section 48(1) of the Local Government Information and Meetings Act
1987, resolves that the public is excluded from the following part of the proceedings of
the Executive, Audit and Risk Committee Meeting on Monday 3 August 2020 for the
following reasons:
Item 8 - Confidential Minutes - 22 June 2020
That the public conduct of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the
meeting would be likely to result in the …
Plan.
Submission No. 4 Federated Farmers Taranaki
Councillor D H McIntyre declared an interest in Submission No. 4 (Federated Farmers
Taranaki) and took no part in the discussions or deliberations.
Resolved
THAT the Taranaki Regional Council
1. thanks the submitter for their submission
2. makes no change to 2017/2018 Annual Plan.
Submission No. 5 Pukeiti Rhododendron Trust
The submitter’s comments in support of their submission were received and noted.
copying and any storage of material in any kind of
information retrieval system.
Whilst NIWA has used all reasonable endeavours to ensure that the information contained in this document is
accurate, NIWA does not give any express or implied warranty as to the completeness of the information
contained herein, or that it will be suitable for any purpose(s) other than those specifically contemplated
during the Project or agreed by NIWA and the Client.
Prepared by:
Elizabeth Graham
OR PLANS AND THE
PROCESSING OF RESOURCE CONSENTS
Request for preparation or change to a
plan/policy statement $50,000
For non-notified farm dairy discharge consent $680
For non-notified consent other $1,020
For notified consents (limited and public) $6,800
Renewal, change or review of consent:
Non-notified $680
Notified (limited and public) $6,800
Extension of a consent lapse date $448
Certificate of compliance $561
Approvals under Resource