the
region’s resources.
1.1.4. Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by SDC, this report also
assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is
SDC, this report also
assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with SDC’s approach to
demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of
information to Council (such as contingency plans
to
plantings and the environment, while
maximising weed control.
GROUND PREPARATION
(pre-plant spraying)
Clear away all grass and weed competition
before planting. Rank vegetation can be
spot-sprayed with a knock-down herbicide
containing the active ingredient glyphosate
eg. Roundup G2. Glyphosate has low
toxicity to wildlife and soil organisms, and
breaks down fast. Spray three or preferably
four weeks before plants go in. Use
Roundup at a rate of 10 ml per litre of
water (for
renewed during the review period, and one consent to discharge emissions into the air at the
plant site.
Monitoring is carried out by both the Company and the Council. The Company monitors water abstraction
rate, effluent flow rate and composition, receiving water quality, odour at the plant boundaries, effluent
loadings and soil and herbage for irrigation areas. The Council undertakes inspections of the plant site and
irrigation areas. Monitoring includes effluent quality checks and
resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review.
Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the
activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the
rates notice)
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
2.5 Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to land title or rates notice)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
2.6 Name of closest river or stream to the works?
page
06/22- #650412 Page 4 of 8
Yes D No a
3.3 Location of activity (Including: Street/road name, number, and locality)
/^o ^oko, ^ /^rates notice)
ft S^c^- g^K// Uyp&r (^^f-^^ ^ur^ P^C\
07/17-#623867 Page 3 of 14
page
3.6 Assessment/Valuatiop number of property (refer to land
.............................................................................................................. 7
6.1.1 Larger earthquakes .......................................................................................... 7
6.1.2 Long-term distribution ..................................................................................... 10
6.1.3 Long-term rate ................................................................................................ 10
6.2 Volcanic significance ................................................................................................... 10
maintained on the stream for the continuous measurement of flow rate and temperature.
Silver Fern Farms Ltd (meat processing plant) demonstrated an overall good level of environmental
performance.
Silver Fern Farms Ltd holds six resource consents, to allow it to maintain a dam in and to take water from
the Tawhiti Stream; to discharge to the stream and to land; and to discharge emissions into the air.
During the period under review, there were no incidents reported in relation to
consents.
Surface water abstraction was compliant with daily rate and volume. Process water discharges were
compliant with consent defined parameters. Surface water monitoring indicated negligible impacts from the
discharge of process waters. The thermal tolerances within the receiving waters were not exceeded for the
duration of the monitoring period.
Emissions monitoring results from the Taranaki Combined Cycle (TCC) were within consent defined
specifications for the full duration of the