Executive Audit and Risk Agenda September 2023 Web
Executive Audit and Risk Agenda September 2023 Web
Executive Audit and Risk Agenda September 2023 Web
Ecosystem health is variable throughout the Southern Hill Country FMU. Nitrogen levels are generally low, but elevated in-stream concentrations of dissolved reactive phosphorous are found in the majority of rivers, along with high rates of sedimentation, which impact aquatic ecosystems. Periphyton is monitored at one site, with occasional blooms occurring, although there is limited data to provide a comprehensive picture of algal growth across this FMU. Macroinvertebrate community
compliance by the consent holder/s during the period under review, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative compliance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to …
like to see passenger rail service established in Taranaki. Respondents were also asked to consider the cost of a rail service in this question: “Taking into account the main barrier to creating a passenger train service is the high cost of creating the infrastructure, would you be willing to contribute via rates for this?” 63% of respondents stated “Yes”. Communities to connect via passenger rail service In response to the question: “If there was a passenger train service, which
Longitude/Latitude or NZTM): ________________________ Longitude ________________________ Latitude OR ________________________ E ________________________ N (NZTM) 3.5 Legal description of property at site of activity (refer to land title or rates notice) _________________________________________________________________________________ 3.6 Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to land title or rates notice)
River, two consents to discharge effluent and solids to land, two consents for structures in watercourses, and one consent to discharge emissions into the air at the plant site. Monitoring is carried out by both the Company and the Council. The Company monitors water abstraction rate, effluent flow rate and composition, receiving water quality, odour at the plant boundaries, effluent loadings and soil and herbage for irrigation areas. The Council undertakes inspections of the plant site and
discharge rates (e) Best practicable option to prevent or minimise any adverse effects on the environment (f) Any matter contained in Appendix V (g) Review of the conditions of consent and the timing and purpose of the review 8 The intensification of Bell Block at an unspecified time in the future is not a matter that could be considered under the matter of discretion listed above. Receiving Environment 9 My assessment of the ability of neighbouring property owners
viable. To assess where irrigation may be viable modelling of irrigation demand was carried out. Only land with a slope less than 15 degrees and that is currently classified as ‘productive farmland’ was considered. Weather and soil water holding data was then analysed and parameters around irrigation application rates and reliability of supply were applied. For the cost benefits of irrigation to be determined the pasture yield response to irrigation was assessed using the AusFarm
details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the
assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. Environmental performance is concerned with actual or likely effects on the receiving environment from the activities during the monitoring year. Administrative performance is concerned with the Company’s approach to demonstrating consent compliance in site operations and management including the timely provision of information to Council (such as contingency plans and water take data)