discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in
Appendix II.
For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high
rates (Statistics NZ)
KPI 2: Mode share for commuter trips for modes
other than single occupancy vehicle
KPI 3: Percentage of active mode and public
transport use for journey to work and school trips
KPI 4: Total public transport network coverage
across region (kms or towns connected to
network)
KPI 5: Number of residents living within x km of
high frequency public transport
KPI 6: Average household spend on transport
page
BTC Part A – Regional
below (less than 10% of) the national environmental standards for air
quality (AQNES) (50 μg/m3). The air downwind of the flare would be rated according to MfE
criteria as ‘excellent’ in respect of the PM10 concentration.
Dioxins/furans: emissions of dioxins and furans expressed as toxic equivalents could not be
distinguished from zero (i.e there was no meaningful difference between the combustion
zone result and the laboratory blank result, at the limits of detection of mass quantities used
low impact recreation use
The experience maintains a high sense of wildness and remoteness encountered along a dynamic coastal edge
Very high
Overall Rating
Outstanding
annotation https://maps.trc.govt.nz/LocalMapsViewer/?map=6f0f4492c76244d5ace0422efa7e6b0c%20&MapExtentID=7 https://maps.trc.govt.nz/LocalMapsViewer/?map=6f0f4492c76244d5ace0422efa7e6b0c%20&MapExtentID=7
page
1
4
6
C
O
A
S
T
A
L
P
L
A
N
F
O
R
T
A
R
The experience maintains a high sense of wildness and remoteness encountered along a dynamic coastal edge
Very high
Overall Rating
Outstanding
page
1
2
4
C
O
A
S
T
A
L
P
L
A
N
F
O
R
T
A
R
A
N
A
K
I
S
c
h
e
d
u
le
2
–
C
o
a
s
t
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
o
f
o
u
t
s
t
a
n
d
in
g
v
a
lu
e
Parininihi.
page
125
CO AS TAL P L AN F O R TARANAK I
The experience maintains a high sense of wildness and remoteness encountered along a dynamic coastal edge
Very high
Overall Rating
Outstanding
page
1
2
4
C
O
A
S
T
A
L
P
L
A
N
F
O
R
T
A
R
A
N
A
K
I
S
c
h
e
d
u
le
2
–
C
o
a
s
t
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
o
f
o
u
t
s
t
a
n
d
in
g
v
a
lu
e
Parininihi.
page
125
CO AS TAL P L AN F O R TARANAK I
Effluent management aside, Options one and two are similar in expecting water ways fenced and
riparian margins managed with timeframes to have this work completed before a regulatory regime
is implemented for those yet to meet the deadlines. The major difference between these two
policies is implementing land based effluent irrigation in all but exceptional circumstances.
In relation to the first two policy options, this report finds that:
• If the rate of fencing experienced in the
activity may have on the environment. In
addition, the applicant is required to identify the ways in which those effects can be avoided, remedied
or mitigated.
Schedule 4 can be viewed at www.trc.govt.nz/resource-consent-application-forms
AEE included? (please attach separate document) ☐ Yes
Where relevant the AEE must include, but not be limited to (tick all that apply): AEE Page Number Section
☐ The rate of discharge and hydrological effects
☐ Ecosystem health
present rates to use it. This should never have even been considered. Vote NO
8 Ross Calgher 1 1
We have as ratepayers already paid in the way of our rates many times for this white elephant now you want to on top of what we are paying to fix the disgusting work that has been done, the
millions that were spent not years ago upgrading kitchens etc. just before oh Dear we are not earth quake proof. That have not been used???/. That upgrade should not have been done till the
critical infrastructure using the methodology
described in Section 1.4, rating assets as nationally, regionally and locally significant.
As a minimum, the data provided included spatial (locational information), asset type and a criticality
rating. At the first project workshop, the criticality assessment process was discussed so that a
reasonably consistent approach was taken across the lifelines sector.
2. Collection of regional hazard information
The most accurate and