Your search for 'rates' returned 2336 results.

Report 2011-2014

consent 43 4. Recommendations 44 Glossary of common terms and abbreviations 45 Bibliography and references 47 Appendix I Resource consents held by Trustpower Ltd in relation to the Patea HEPS 1 Appendix II Lake Rotorangi Hazard Maps 1 page ii List of tables Table 1 Summary of breaches of flow rise and recession rates in the 2011-2014 period 17 Table 2 Summary of lake levels in relation to consent conditions 20 Table 3 Reports submitted to

Ample Group monitoring report 2018-2019

wastewater records indicated that discharges to the Kahouri Stream did not meet the 1:100 dilution factor. For the latter two incidents the Company has been sent a 14 day letter requesting an explanation for the breaches, and further page enforcement action may follow. As a result of the issues, the Company’s environmental performance rating for the year under review has been downgraded. During the year, the Company demonstrated a level of environmental and administrative

Dairy Discharge Monitoring Programme

and cost recovery 39 11 Training 41 12 Quality assurance and control 42 13 Review and reporting 43 14 References 44 List of photographs Photo 1 Farm dairy and cows 2 Photo 2 Condition based monitoring with portable device 27 Photo 3 Visual inspection to check condition of the irrigator and application rate 28 Photo 4 Collecting samples, recording temperature and entering sample information into the laboratory database remotely 29 Photo 5 Officer completing inspection

Investigation of air quality arising from flaring of fracturing fluids

below (less than 10% of) the national environmental standards for air quality (AQNES) (50 μg/m3). The air downwind of the flare would be rated according to MfE criteria as ‘excellent’ in respect of the PM10 concentration. Dioxins/furans: emissions of dioxins and furans expressed as toxic equivalents could not be distinguished from zero (i.e there was no meaningful difference between the combustion zone result and the laboratory blank result, at the limits of detection of mass quantities used

Westown Haulage Cowling Road Annual Report 2021-2022

compliance by the consent holders, this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in Appendix II For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental performance and compliance for 88% of

CPSchedule2

low impact recreation use  The experience maintains a high sense of wildness and remoteness encountered along a dynamic coastal edge Very high Overall Rating Outstanding annotation https://maps.trc.govt.nz/LocalMapsViewer/?map=6f0f4492c76244d5ace0422efa7e6b0c%20&MapExtentID=7 https://maps.trc.govt.nz/LocalMapsViewer/?map=6f0f4492c76244d5ace0422efa7e6b0c%20&MapExtentID=7 page 1 4 6 C O A S T A L P L A N F O R T A R

Schedule 2 - Coastal areas of outstanding value

The experience maintains a high sense of wildness and remoteness encountered along a dynamic coastal edge Very high Overall Rating Outstanding page 1 2 4 C O A S T A L P L A N F O R T A R A N A K I S c h e d u le 2 – C o a s t a l a r e a s o f o u t s t a n d in g v a lu e Parininihi. page 125 CO AS TAL P L AN F O R TARANAK I

Schedule II: Coastal areas of outstanding value

The experience maintains a high sense of wildness and remoteness encountered along a dynamic coastal edge Very high Overall Rating Outstanding page 1 2 4 C O A S T A L P L A N F O R T A R A N A K I S c h e d u le 2 – C o a s t a l a r e a s o f o u t s t a n d in g v a lu e Parininihi. page 125 CO AS TAL P L AN F O R TARANAK I

Dairy Farm Practices and Management Report (DairyNZ)

Effluent management aside, Options one and two are similar in expecting water ways fenced and riparian margins managed with timeframes to have this work completed before a regulatory regime is implemented for those yet to meet the deadlines. The major difference between these two policies is implementing land based effluent irrigation in all but exceptional circumstances. In relation to the first two policy options, this report finds that: • If the rate of fencing experienced in the