performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the consent holders,
this report also assigns a rating as to each Company’s environmental and administrative performance during
the period under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both
environmental and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in
Appendix II.
For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were
Upper and middle reaches
very highly rated for
aesthetic and scenic values.
Median flow of 3500l/s at Mangatete Bridge. Steep gradients in upper and
mid reaches with significant water movement and many rapids. Water
quantity and movement contributes significantly to wild and scenic character.
39% total riparian cover, upper reaches mostly indigenous, middle reaches
mixed vegetation, exotic trees and pasture, lower reaches barren or
introduced grasses and weeds.
management and, ultimately, through the refinement of methods
and considered responsible resource utilisation, to move closer to achieving sustainable development of the
region’s resources.
1.1.4 Evaluation of environmental and administrative performance
Besides discussing the various details of the performance and extent of compliance by SDC, this report also
assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period under
review.
Environmental …
for comparison with
. ... ... guideline values. In other words, how many sheds could be discharging odour at
.^ \ SA
i . ^' 5
. ^/^!
page
16
maximum rate at any one time. Dr Brady and Ms Barclay consider that the number
of sheds discharging at the higher rate is best determined using statistical techniques
based on empirical data. The other experts do not agree that there are sufficient
data to allow reliable conclusions to be drawn.
[51] Mr Chilton provided a
Apologies Councillor M P Joyce
Councillor D N MacLeod
Councillor N W Walker
Notification of Late Items
Item Page Subject
Item 1 4 Confirmation of Minutes
Item 2 11 Consents and Regulatory Committee Minutes
Item 3 16 Policy and Planning Committee Minutes
Item 4 22 Regional Transport Committee Minutes
Item 5 30 Executive, Audit and Risk Committee Minutes
Item 6 35 Joint Committee Minutes
Item 7 48 Setting of Rates 2017/2018
Item 8 54 Navigation contract and the
various details of the performance and extent of compliance by the Company, this
report also assigns them a rating for their environmental and administrative performance during the period
under review. The rating categories are high, good, improvement required and poor for both environmental
and administrative performance. The interpretations for these ratings are found in Appendix II.
For reference, in the 2021-2022 year, consent holders were found to achieve a high level of environmental
Otago Regional Council
Percentages of consents in full compliance, low
risk/ technical non compliance, moderate non
compliance and significant non compliance on a
per monitoring event basis
FULL
COMPLIANCE
LOW RISK/TECHNICAL
NON-COMPLIANCE
MODERATE
NON-COMPLIANCE
SIGNIFICANT
NON-COMPLIANCE
* The non-compliance rating system used at WRC considers multiple factors, and not solely whether the non-compliance results
in actual significant environmental effect. As such the
rates notice)
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
2.5 Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to land title or rates notice)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
2.6 Name of closest river or stream to the works?
page
07/23- #650412 Page 4 of 8
rates notice)
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
2.5 Assessment/Valuation number of property (refer to land title or rates notice)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
2.6 Name of closest river or stream to the works?
page
07/23- #650412 Page 4 of 8